If “level one” questions
allow you to identify the nature of the document and its author, “level
two” questions allow you to probe behind the essentials facts. Now that
you know who wrote the document, to whom it is addressed, and what it
is
about, you can begin to try to understand it. Since your goal is to
learn
what this document means, first in its historical context and then in
your
current context, you now want to study it from a more detached point of
view, to be less accepting of “facts” and more critical in the
questions
you pose. At the first level, the document controlled you; at the
second
level, you will begin to control the document.
1. Why was this
document
written?
Everything is written for a reason. You make notes to yourself to
remember,
you send cards to celebrate and sympathize, you correspond to convey or
request information. The documents that historians traditionally study
are more likely to have been written for public rather than private
purposes,
but not always. Understanding the purpose of a historical document is
critical
to analyzing the strategies that the author employs within it. A
document
intended to convince will employ logic; a document intended to
entertain
will employ fancy; a document attempting to motivate will employ
emotional
appeals. In order to find these strategies, you must know what purpose
the document was intended to serve.
2. What type of
document
is this?
The form of the document is vital to its purpose. You would expect
a telephone book to be alphabetized, a poem to be in meter, and a work
of philosophy to be in prose. The form or genre in which a document
appears
is always carefully chosen. Genre contains its own conventions, which
fulfill
the expectations of author and audience. A prose map of how one travels
from Chicago to Boston might be as effective as a conventional map, but
it would not allow for much of the incidental information that a
conventional
map contains and would be much harder to consult. A map in poetry would
be mind-boggling!
3. What are the basic
assumptions made in this document?
All documents make assumptions that are bound up with their intended
audience, with the form in which they are written, and with their
purpose.
Some of these assumptions are so integral to the document that they are
left unsaid, others are so important to establish that they form a part
of the central argument.
Level Three
So far, you have been
asking
questions of your document that you can learn directly from it.
Sometimes
it is more difficult to know who composed a document than who the
intended
audience was. Sometimes you have to guess at the purpose of the
document.
But essentially questions on level one and level two are questions with
direct answers. Once you have learned to ask them, you will have a
great
deal of information about the historical document at your disposal. You
will then be able to think historically-that is, to pose your own
questions
about the past and to use the material the document presents to seek
for
answers. In level three, you will exercise your critical imagination,
probing
the materials and developing your own assessment of its value. “Level
three”
questions will not always have definite answers; in fact, they are the
kind of questions that arouse disagreement and debate and that make for
lively classroom discussion.
1. Can I believe this
document?
To be successful, a document designed to persuade, to recount events,
or to motivate people to action must be believable to its audience. For
the critical historical reader, it is that very believability that must
be examined. Every author has a point of view, and exposing the
assumptions
of the document is an essential task for the reader. You must treat all
claims skeptically. One question you certainly want to ask is, “Is this
a likely story?”
2. What can I learn
about the society that produced this document?
All documents unintentionally reveal things that are embedded in the
very language, structure, and assumptions of the document that can tell
you the most about the historical period or event that you are
studying.
3. What does this
document mean to me?
So What? Other than for the practical purpose of passing your exams
and the course, why should you be concerned with historical documents?
What can you learn from them? Only you can answer those questions. But
you will not be able to answer them until you have asked them. You
should
demand the meaning of each document you read: what it meant to the
historical
actors – authors, audience, and society – and what it means to your own
society.
Now that you have seen how
to unfold the map of a historical document you must get used to asking
these questions by yourself. The temptation will be great to jump from
level one to level three, to start in the middle, or to pose the
questions
in no sequence at all. After all, you probably have a ready-made answer
to “What does this document mean to me?” But if you develop the
discipline
of asking all your questions in the proper order, you will soon find
that
you are able to gain command of a document.