|
THEORIZING DECADENCE: MEN, WOMEN, AND OTHER MONSTERS IN LATE-VICTORIAN MYTHOLOGIES |
|
Dr.
C. Snodgrass; 4336 Turlington, 392-6650, ext. 262; 376-8362; snod@english.ufl.edu
COURSE DESCRIPTION AND GOALS
For a long time now, literary/cultural criticism has accepted the proposition
that cultural paradigms and the social “narratives” supporting them are constructions
of a particular historical moment, not natural laws. It is therefore
intriguing whenever modern criticism clings to ideological “mythologies”
of distant historical periods, even as it ostensibly identifies such cultural
paradigms as mythic constructions. Some of the more striking examples
of this kind of blind spot involve several of the cultural paradigms of the
Victorian Period, not least the tenacious idea of a fin-de-siècle
decadence. This course will investigate the cultural assumptions underlying
a few late-nineteenth-century mythologies, especially those founded on carefully
coded representations of gender identity and invoking images of the grotesque.
It will not be our focus to explain why certain prejudices about the late-Victorian
era have resisted normal revisionism, but along the way you may be able to
draw some conclusions about that.
We will begin by reading a few twentieth-century critical discussions of
Victorian ideas about the fin de siècle and its fears of degeneration,
including the period of the 1890s routinely referred to as the Decadence,
as well as some of the most famous criticism about certain supporting elements,
such as the Woman Question, the Feminine Ideal, homosocial culture, and the
Empire. We will also read key Victorian commentaries touching on concepts
of the grotesque and examine how the cultural paradigms they reference were
embedded in a large number of Victorian poems, short fiction, plays, and
visual images. The visual images that bombarded the late-Victorian
period will be considered as texts equal in interest to written texts.
We’ll be studying works by both familiar and relatively unfamiliar (“non-canonical”)
figures. Among the specific figures we’ll study are John Ruskin; Walter
Pater; the melodrama playwright Arthur Wing Pinero; the “sex-crazed” poet,
fiction writer, and premier critic Arthur Symons; poet Michael Field (pseudonym
for lesbian aunt-and-niece collaborators); the iconic lyric poet Ernest Dowson;
the New Woman fiction writers George Egerton (Mary Chavelita Dunne), Ella
D’Arcy, and Victoria Cross; fiction writer Henry Harland (literary editor
of The Yellow Book); acclaimed poets John Gray and Lionel Johnson; poet and
critic Richard Le Gallienne; women poets Mathilda Blind, Olive Custance,
Graham R. Tomson, Edith Nesbit, May Kendall, Mary Elizabeth Coleridge, and
Charlotte Mew; and, of course, considerable material by Oscar Wilde and Aubrey
Beardsley.
Program Status: This course can be applied
toward fulfilling part of the requirements for several possible program “tracks,”
including but not limited to the Victorian Studies and Cultural Studies program
tracks.