ARCHAEOLOGICAL THEORY
Spring 2003 (Sect. 7890)
Class Meeting Times:
T Per 8-9 (3-4:55 pm), Th Per 8 (3-3:50pm)
in B357 Turlington
Office: B338 Turlington Phone: 392-2253 x222
Office Hours: T 10-12, 1-2 and Th 1-2, and
by appointment
Email
me
www.clas.ufl.edu/users/sgillesp
| COURSE DESIGN: ANT 4110
is the most advanced archaeology course offered to UF undergraduates. It
is designed for advanced Anthropology majors and will especially benefit
those planning to go to graduate school in archaeology or bioarchaeology.
Students in History or Classics with an emphasis on archaeology may also
find this course of interest. Students should have a good background in
anthropology and archaeology; for the latter, minimally the core introductory
archaeology course, ANT 3141. Students who have taken ANT 4114, courses
on the prehistory or archaeology of a major world area, and field or laboratory
courses will also be better prepared to deal with the abstract and philosophical
contents of this course than will students without such background.
COURSE DESCRIPTION: This course examines the major theoretical frameworks within academic archaeology by which inferences have been made about the past and archaeological knowledge has been produced. Course content emphasizes 20th century developments in American archaeology, especially its shifting relationships with sociocultural anthropology. Readings are chosen from the older, seminal writings as well as more current essays on theory. This literature is approached in topical and chronological order to assess the major theoretical developments in their historical context, to understand how ideas emerged in relation to earlier issues. Methodology (middle-level theory) is also included, but the emphasis is on higher-level social science theories. Through this critical survey, students will be introduced to the different theoretical approaches in use in contemporary archaeology. COURSE OBJECTIVES AND STUDENT GOALS: Students are expected to gain a strong foundation in the major social science concepts and problems upon which anthropological archaeology is based, relating empirical research to underlying abstract ideas and perspectives. They should become familiar with the different perspectives and approaches to the past in American archaeology, the tenets upon which these perspectives are based, and the strengths and limitations that they pose. They should learn how to critique theories and their applications to data, and reflect on how knowledge of the past has been constructed and interpreted. They will apply their knowledge to data sets as a way of better comprehending how different theoretical frameworks will lead to different interpretations of the past. COURSE FORMAT: IMPORTANT: This course combines lectures with group and class discussions! Specific portions of class time are set aside for discussions and written assignments in which everyone is expected to participate and to be prepared. Even during the lectures, students are expected to ask/answer questions about the material. You cannot simply sit back and be passive; you must actively participate. You are being asked to think and reflect on complex and abstract concepts, and to apply them yourself. REQUIRED READINGS: No textbook adequately covers all the topics examined in this course. Thus, required readings are drawn from journal articles, chapters in anthologies, and excerpts from books. They have been organized into a single course packet. Assigned readings for each class meeting are given in the course outline that follows. You must read the assignments before that class. Students are required to take and show their notes on the readings to the instructor at the beginning of each class. This is to encourage critical analysis of each reading. In order to learn how to read critically, take notes on the following for each reading:
CLASS PARTICIPATION AND ATTENDANCE POLICY: Because the course is designed around lectures, in-class discussions, and group projects that deal with complex ideas, missing class will prove detrimental to your understanding of that material and ultimately to your final grade. If you must miss class, it is YOUR responsibility to obtain the lecture notes from a classmate. Attendance is taken every class period, and together with class participation (discussion, group projects, and written exercises) counts towards 20% of the final grade. Consistent absences will result in a substantial drop in the final grade. Only involuntary absences will be excused, and documentation must be presented to support your request for an excused absence. Failure to be prepared for the discussion, or to participate in group projects, is not much different from being absent and will also be noted. EXAMS: Two in-class midterms and a cumulative take-home final exam, all of which cover lectures and readings, will be administered. They consist of short- and long-answer essays. The two midterms are each worth 25% of the final grade, and the final is worth 30%, for a total of 80%. Missed Exams may be made up ONLY if you have a valid excuse for an involuntary absence during the exam period and if you (or someone on your behalf) has informed the professor before the exam begins that you have a valid excuse. Missed exams should be made up within one week of the original exam period at the instructor's convenience. GRADES: All grades in this course are earned, not negotiated. Grading is based on mastery of the course material as determined from the exams (80%), plus class participation and group or individual projects (20%). Letter grades are assigned only at the end of the semester, according to the following scale: 90-100% = A (minimally 270 out of 300 points), 80-89% = B (240-269 points), 70-79% = C (210-239 points), 60=69% = D (180 points needed to pass). There is no "extra" credit. Federal privacy regulations prevent the release of scores and grades over the phone or by email. Please do not ask for your test scores or letter grades by these means. If you want to know your final grade early, give a stamped, self-addressed envelope to the professor during the final exam period. COPYRIGHT INFORMATION: Lectures may not be tape-recorded without the prior express written permission of Susan D. Gillespie. The contents of the syllabus, lectures, lecture outlines, and handouts for this course are copyrighted, intended for the private use of students registered in ANT 4110. They may not legally be reproduced or used for other purposes. ACCEPTANCE OF COURSE REQUIREMENTS: By remaining registered in this class, you agree to accept the course requirements and expectations as stated in this syllabus. These are in addition to other general University requirements and codes of conduct as stated in official documents. All students must fill out the back page of this syllabus and return it to the professor before the day of the first exam. This is a course requirement. |
| DATE: |
|
| Jan. 7 | I. Introduction: Key
Concepts and Goals of Anthropological Archaeology
Phillips 1955: American Archaeology and General Anthropological Theory |
| Jan. 9 | II. Brief History of New World
Archaeology as Anthropology
Taylor 1948: The Development of Archaeology (Chap. 1 of A Study of Archaeology) |
| Jan. 14 | III. Definitions of Culture
1-page diagram relating "culture" to the archaeological record Taylor 1948: Archaeology: History or Anthropology? (Chap. 2 of A Study of Archaeology) Binford 1962: Archaeology as Anthropology |
| Jan. 16 | IV. Theories of Culture
Thomas 1991: What is Culture? (pp. 31-34 from Archaeology: Down to Earth) 1-page: Shifting Definitions of Culture |
| Jan. 21 | V. Units and Structure of the Archaeological
Record
Willey and Phillips 1958: Archaeological Unit Concepts (from Method and Theory in American Archaeology) Sharer and Ashmore 2003: The Forms of Archaeological Data (pp. 120-126 from Archaeology: Discovering Our Past) 1-page diagram: The Structure of Archaeological Data VI. Research Design: Models and Paradigms
|
| Jan. 23 | Case Study: Settlement Pattern Models
begin Los Tepalcates Valley project [in readings packet] |
| Jan. 28 | VII. Epistemology, Science, and Pseudo-Science
Feder 1990: Epistemology: How You Know What You Know Thomas 1991: What's a Scientific Approach? (pp. 34-43 from Archaeology: Down to Earth) 1-page: Science and the Scientific Method Epstein 1987: "Scholars Will Call it Nonsense": The Structure of Erich von Däniken's Argument |
| Jan. 30 | VIII. The Role and Levels of Theory
Kluckhohn 1940: The Conceptual Structure in Middle American Studies Salzman 2001: Introduction to Theory (Chap. 1 from Understanding Culture) 1- page: excerpts from Kluckhohn, Dunnell, Brewer on Theory - Method - Technique Thomas 1991: Levels of Archaeological Theory (pp. 43-47 from Archaeology: Down to Earth) 1-page: Levels of Theory (from Trigger 1989 A History of Archaeological Thought) Los Tepalcates Valley project due |
| Feb. 4 | EXAM I |
| Feb. 6 | IX. "Culture Areas" and "Culture History"
Kroeber 1931: The Culture-Area and Age-Area Concepts of Clark Wissler (excerpt) Steward 1942: The Direct Historical Approach to Archaeology Hawkes 1954: Archeological Theory and Method: Some Suggestions from the Old World |
| Feb. 11 | X. Culture History: Mechanisms of Culture
Change
Steward 1929: Diffusion or Independent Invention: A Critique of Logic Childe1956: What Happened In Prehistory (excerpt from Piecing Together the Past) Willey 1956: An Archaeological Classification of Culture Contact Situations (excerpt) (Bring your Los Tepalcates project to class.) |
| Feb. 13 | XI. Regularities or Specificities? (Evolution
or History?): A Turning Point
Steward 1949: Culture Causality and Law: A Trial Formulation of the Development of Early Civilizations Flannery 1967: Culture History versus Cultural Process: A Debate in American Archaeology |
| Feb.18 | XII. Analogy and Inference
Binford 1967: Smudge Pits and Hide-Smoking: The Use of Analogy in Archaeological Reasoning. |
| Feb. 20 | Classification exercise
Gillespie 2000: Archaeological Classification; work on the assignment on p. 41 and bring it to next class meeting |
| Feb. 25 | XIII. Classification: Where to Draw the
Line?
Spaulding 1953 Statistical Techniques for the Discovery of Artifact Types. Ford 1954 The Type Concept Revisited Rouse 1960: The Classification of Artifacts in Archaeology |
| Feb. 27 | XIV. Middle-Range Theory: Site Formation
Processes and the Static/Dynamic Conundrum
Sharer and Ashmore 2003: The Determinants of Archaeological Data (pp. 127-138 from Archaeology: Discovering Our Past) Binford 1981:"Middle-range Research and the Role of Actualistic Studies" |
| Mar. 4 | XV. Culture Process: A "New" Epistemology--Logical
Positivist Explanations
Binford 1968: Some Comments on Historical Versus Processual Archaeology Watson, LeBlanc, and Redman 1971: The Logic of Science (from Explanation in Archaeology: An Explicitly Scientific Approach) (bring your Los Tepalcates project to class) |
| Mar. 6 | XVI. The Society/Individual Conundrum:
Methodological Holism(Determinism) vs Methodological Individualism
White 1949: Energy and the Evolution of Culture 1-page: The First and Second Sociologies (drawn from Ritzer and Gindoff 1994) 1-page: What is the Archaeological Record? |
| Mar. 10-14 | Spring Break |
| Mar. 18 | EXAM II |
| Mar.20 | XVII. Culture Processual Explanations:
Ecology, Adaptation, and Evolution
Watson, LeBlanc, and Redman 1971: The Ecological View of Culture (in Explanation in Archaeology: An Explicitly Scientific Approach) Burnham 1973: The Explanatory Value of the Concept of Adaptation in Studies of Culture Change |
| Mar. 25 | XVIII. Culture Processual Explanations:
Materialist Theories
Kohl 1981: Materialist Approaches in Prehistory |
| Mar. 27 | XIX. Holism, Logical Positivism,
and Evolution on Trial
Kohl 1985: Symbolic/Cognitive Archaeology: A New Loss of Innocence 1-page: Important Definitions ("Isms") |
| Apr. 1 | XX. The Return of History
Hodder 1987: The Contribution of the Long Term (in Archaeology as Long-Term History) Green 2000: Trigger's Holistic Archaeology and Pacific Culture History XXI. Post-Processual Interpretations: Individual,
Meaning, and Context
|
| Apr. 3 | Finish XXI. contextual archaeology
bring your Los Tepalcates project for discussion |
| Apr. 8 | XXII. Post-Processual Interpretations:
Cognitive and Symbolic Approaches
Schlanger 1994: Mindful Technology: Unleashing the Chaîne Opératoire for an Archaeology of Mind Gillespie 2003: The Archaeology of Meaning |
| Apr. 10 | No Class - Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology |
| Apr. 15 | XXIII. Post-Processual Interpretations:
Critical Theory: Ideology and Constructivism
Preucel 1991: The Philosophy of Archaeology Conkey and Spector 1984: Archaeology and the Study of Gender bring your Los Tepalcates project for discussion |
| Apr. 17 | XXIV.Post-Processual Interpretations:
Methodological Relationism and the Reproduction of Society
Trigger 1991: Constraint and Freedom: A New Synthesis for Archaeological Explanation? Dobres and Robb 2000: Agency in Archaeology: Paradigm or Platitude? |
| Apr. 22 | XXV. Post-Processual Interpretations:
Ethnic, Nationalist Archaeologies: Identity-Formation,
Power, and
the Politicization of Archaeology
Kohl 1998: Nationalism and Archaeology: On the Constructions of Nations and the Reconstructions of the Remote Past. (no author) 1996: 35,000-year-old Artifacts Repatriated in Tasmania Take-home final exam distributed (Due date TBA) |
|
1) Students seeking modification of due dates for assignments and exams for religious reasons (e.g., holiday observance) should feel free to contact the Professor and request this modification. 2) Students seeking any classroom accommodation to facilitate their education must first register with the Dean of Students Office. The Dean of Students Office will provide documentation to the student, who must then provide this documentation to the Professor when requesting accommodation. 3) The University reminds every student of the implied pledge of Academic Honesty: on any work submitted for credit the student has neither received nor given unauthorized aid. This refers to cheating and plagiarism. Students should consult the Student Guide at www.dso.ufl.edu/stg/ for information. For more information about what plagiarism is and how to avoid it and its dire consequences, visit www.csubak.edu/ssric/Modules/Other/plagiarism.htm |
COPYRIGHT ©2003 Susan D. Gillespie, All Rights Reserved
| *****************************************************************************
Complete and return this page to the professor as soon as possible and no later than the day the first exam is given. This is a course requirement for ANT 4110. This information is kept confidential and is used solely to help the professor assist students and accommodate their interests, wherever possible. Name: _________________________________________________________________ Preferred nickname?: _______________________________________________ Local Phone #: _________________________ LEGIBLY PRINT your Email address: ________________________________________ Year in school: _________________________ Academic Major: __________________________________________________________ List prior anthropology/archaeology courses you have taken: ________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Please state your interest, whatever it might be, in taking this class: ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________
|