AMH 3500, Sect. 5195
    Spring 2007
    History of US Labor
exam2

Final exam



Instructor: Robert H. Zieger. Office is 236 Keene-Flint. Hours: Monday, 2-3 pm; Wednesday, 11:45-12:30; Friday, 9:35-10:25. Phone: 392-0271, ex. 252. E-mail: zieger@ufl.edu[.] The address for my home page is: http://www.clas.ufl.edu/users/rzieger. This site contains a copy of this syllabus with a link to running account of class activities. Students are responsible for checking this website regularly for announcements and materials.

Course objectives: To acquaint students with the historical experience of working people in the US; to encourage thoughtful consideration of problems relating to class, race, and gender in US history; to help students to sharpen research, writing, and analytical skills.

Required readings: Bruce Laurie, Artisans into Workers; Robert Zieger and Gilbert J. Gall, American Workers, American Unions (3d ed.); Ira Katznelson, When Affirmative Action Was White.  These books are available at Gator Textbook, 3501 SW 2d Ave. Suite D (374-4500). There will be additional readings accessible through UF Library's electronic Course Reserve. Note: I donate my share of royalties from student purchase of AWAU, which will amount to about $20.00, to the Department of History's George E. Pozzetta fund.

Exams, grading: There are four elements involved in grading: periodic reading quizzes (20%; three lowest scores and/or absences dropped; no make-ups; students must score 60% or better on quizzes to pass course); two hourly exams (Feb. 21 and March 26), each counting 25%; and a final exam (due May 3, 9:30 a.m.; 30%). It is expected that students will keep a true copy of any paper that they turn in.  Students are expected to attend class regularly and to have completed the reading assignment indicated for each session, below. In the event of absence, students will want to consult the website. Click on this link for daily class activities. There will be frequent quizzes on reading assignments, some of which will be posted on the website before the class in which the quiz is to be administered. But do note that in order to receive credit for a quiz, the student must attend the whole class session. Since these quizzes are designed to encourage attendance and discussion of assigned reading, there will be no make-up quizzes for any reason. I will drop the lowest 3 scores (including zeroes for non-attendance) in calculating the final quiz grade. Students must achieve a grade of 60% or higher on the quizzes to pass the course.  If students find that they are unable, owing to illness, personal obligations, or other reasons, to attend class regularly, they should make arrangements to drop the course, since attendance, as registered by the quiz format, is a critical component of the course.



    Notices

Students requesting classroom accommodations must first register with the Dean of Students Office.  A student requesting classroom accommodation must then present the resulting documentation to the instructor. The singularly unhelpful Disabilities Resources website is http://www.dso.ufl.edu/drc/  

An unpleasant reminder:  Students are alerted to the Department of History's statement on Academic Honesty, contained in the Department's Manual on Policies and Procedures.  This statement covers plagiarism, attribution, citation, multiple submission of papers, bogus data, plain old cheating, and student defense. Students are expected to be, or to become, familiar with standard legitimate practices and may inspect the above document in the Department office, Room 025, Keene-Flint Hall. The University's "honesty policy" is available at www.dso.ufl.edu/judicial/ I'll be happy to advise and counsel on these matters.

    Class sessions
January 8-Introduction

January 10-Laurie, Artisans into Workers, 113-40

January 12-Laurie, 140-58

January 15-MLK, Jr. holiday

January 17-Laurie, 158-75

January 19-Letwin, "Interracial Unionism, Gender, and 'Social Equality'" (Course Reserve–CR)

January 22-Laurie, 176-98

January 24-Laurie, 198-220

January 26-Zieger & Gall (Z&G), American Workers, 1-18

January 29-Access http://www.ilr.cornell.edu/trianglefire/ and view images, read text

January 31-Z&G, 18-32

February 2-Reading: "Socialism" (CR)

February 5-Z&G, 33-42

February 7–Arnesen, "'Like Banquo's Ghost, It Will Not Down'" (CR)

February 9–Lipartito, “When Women Were Switches” (CR)

February 12–Z&G, 42-49

February 14–Hall, “Disorderly Women” (CR).  First hourly exam questions distributed.

February 16–Film: The Inheritance

February 19–Access http://www.english.uiuc.edu/maps/depression/photoessay.htm and study images

February 21–Z&G, 50-65; turn in hourly exam.

February 23–Lois Rita Helmbold, "Downward Occupational Mobility During the Great Depression” (CR)

February 26–Z&G, 66-75

February 28–Z&G, 75-82

March 2–Z&G, 82-103

March 5–Katznelson, Affirmative Action, pp. 25-79

March 7–Z&G, 104-118

March 9–Z&G, 126-43

March 19–Z&G, 123-26;  Bruce Nelson, "Organized Labor and the Struggle for Black Equality in Mobile during World War II” (CR).  Second hourly exam questions distributed.

March 21-Film: The Life and Times of Rosie the Riveter

March 23–Z&G, 118-23; Ruth Milkman, "Rosie the Riveter Revisited” (CR)

March 26–United Students Against Sweatshops program.  Second hourly exam to be turned in.

March 28–Katznelson, Affirmative Action, 80-141.

March 30– Z&G, 144-68

April 2--Z&G, 168-81

April 4--Z&G, 182-192

April 6-Z&G, 192-209

April 9–Z&G, 229-39

April 11–Z&G, 214-20

April 13–Z&G, 220-28

April 16–Z&G, 209-13; Honey, "Martin Luther King, Jr. . . . and the Memphis Sanitation Strike" (CR)

April 18–Nancy MacLean, “The Hidden History of Affirmative Action”(CR)

April 20–Katznelson, Affirmative Action, ix-xv, 1-24; 142-72

April 23–Z&G, 240-70

April 25–Wrap-up; final exam questions distributed; course evaluation

May 3–Final exam to be turned in by 9:30 a.m.


*****

    Rules for take-home exams

Questions for take-home exams will be distributed on the dates indicated in the syllabus.  I'll also post them on the course website.  Students are expected to choose one question on which to write and to produce a well-crafted essay that responds to the question thoughtfully.  Pay careful attention to the writing rules, posted below and linked here.

1.  In grading these papers, I give great weight to the first paragraph.  It must contain your most significant conclusions about the subject under discussion.  It is likely that you will re-write the first paragraph after finishing the main body of the essay because it is often the case that a writer gains a full sense of her or his argument only after working through the issues.

2.  Papers must be typed and double-spaced.   Staple the pages.

3.  Answers must not exceed 1500 words (the equivalent of 6 typed, double-spaced sheets).

4. In developing your response to the question you choose to write on, in addition to reference to relevant class-required readings, select and make serious use of a substantial article in a scholarly journal relevant to your subject.  You can find such an article by using JSTOR or America:  History and Life, both available electronically through the Smathers Course site.

5. Respond to the question in your own words, drawing on class presentations, required readings, and the selected additional source (see no. 4 above).  Don’t overquote.

6. Refer specifically to the readings, both class-required and outside, upon which you draw, whether you quote them or merely refer to them. Always make the identity of the author clear. ("As Woodly Darrow argues. . ."; or, "Contrary to the view of Frieda Burpp. . .").

7. Be precise in references to people, organizations, legislative acts, court decisions, and so forth. Make sure the essay contains frequent references to chronology and that it develops in a clear chronological fashion.

8. See the section linked Writing Rules for more detailed advice about writing and mechanics.

9. Questions, suggestions, advice, encouragement? I'm your guy.

Grading weights for take-home exams


First paragraph. 15 pts.
Cogency of overall approach. 25 pts.
Factual accuracy and chronological development. 15 pts.
Use of required readings. 10 pts.
Quality of and engagement with student-selected sources. 15 pts.
Quality of writing (organization, clarity, observance of writing rules). 20 pts.

*****

How to write

1. The first paragraph of a historical paper, be it a research paper, short synopsis, or book review, should contain the author's central thesis or conclusions. The author must mention all important actors, as well as inclusive dates of coverage and basic concepts or historical developments in the first paragraph.

2. Use vigorous, direct language.  Short sentences work.  Employ concrete, precise nouns and active verbs, being careful, for example, to find active substitutes for forms of the verb "to be" and "to go."  Inexperienced writers often erroneously think that convoluted language, long sentences, and pretentious diction impress teachers.

3.  Use the active, not the passive voice, in your prose.  The active voice places the subject before the action.  Active voice:  On opening day, Barry Bonds blasted his 71st home run.  Passive voice:  His 71st home run was blasted by Barry Bonds on opening day.  If you are uncertain on this important point, review http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/grammar/g_actpass.html

4. Avoid all first-person or surrogate references.  By "surrogate" I mean such terms as one, we, the current writer.

5. Avoid discussion of method, intentions, and structure. There is no need to intrude explicit statements of authorial intention ("In the following pages, I am going to argue that. . . ."-just state the argument) or to deliver bulletins about the paper's structure ("This paper is divided into three sections. . . ."-just state your three central arguments or observations in a well-crafted opening paragraph).  I agree with writer Samuel Hynes that "the less obtrusive the story-teller is, the better for the story, and . . . when an assertive narrating personality shoulders his [or her] way between the reader and the subject, biography [and history] suffer. . . ."

6. Inclusion of frequent chronological references and their placement at the beginnings of sentences, paragraphs, phrases, and so forth contributes significantly to more accessible and dynamic prose.

7. It is easy to fall into stuffy, pompous, trite rhetorical patterns. Double negatives, for example, often only lend inflated importance to commonplace observations. The gratuitous imputation of erroneous views to the reader is another bad habit (as in: "It would be unfair to conclude that Nixon was a homosexual. . ."; or "It would be a gross overstatement to say that the South won the Civil War. . . ."  In both cases, the reader is being warned against making an error that the author is actually suggesting).

8. Don't use lengthy block quotes. Always paraphrase and integrate into your own prose.  Confine quoted words to short, distinctive selections, subordinating quoted material to your own purposes and your own language.

9. There is much dismissive talk these days about so-called "political correctness."  It is important for serious people to weigh carefully their language when referring to ethnicity, race, gender, and other politically charged subjects.  Many complaints about the need to be "politically correct" reflect a desire on the part of politically or culturally dominant groups or interests to have license in the language they use to characterize or refer to minority, subordinated, or vulnerable groups.  Language is a powerful tool.  Use it judiciously, carefully, and with due respect for your fellow human beings.  No one ever accused Adolph Hitler of being "politically correct."



    Common errors and bad habits

1. Run-on sentences. When in doubt, start a new sentence.  Short sentences work.

2. Misplaced modifiers. ("Jumping out of bed, my shoulder hurt"; "Based on this evidence, Prof. Jones argues. . . ").

    3. Quotations and punctuation marks. Remember these lifetime rules:  In American English--

    Commas and periods always go inside quotation marks
    Colons and semi-colons always go outside quotation marks
        Question marks and exclamation points (which latter you have no need for in this paper) depend on the context.

4. Distinguish between possessives, which take the apostrophe, and plurals, which don't. There are specific rules for plural possessives (e.g., for nouns ending in s, add apostrophe s to make the possessive; but for pluralized nouns otherwise not ending in s, just add the apostrophe). Examples: Margaritas are made with tequila (correct).  Margaritas' [or Margarita's] are made with lime juice (incorrect).  The Margaritas' intoxicatory properties turned me into a zombie (correct).

5. Watch out for its and it's.  Its is the possessive, as in "I liked the house because of its roominess."  It's is the contraction for it is, as in "It's going to rain today."

6. Adjectives and adverbs--get rid of as many as possible.  In general, the higher the proportion of verbs in your writing, the more vigorous and effective it will be.  Especially, strike the words "very" and "interesting" from your written vocabulary.

6. Comparisons and parallels.  Make sure that when you make or draw them, the terms are consistent with each other.  ("In regard to onions, Harding's smelled stronger than Coolidge"–should be: stronger than "those of Coolidge" or "Coolidge's.")

7. Be a "which" hunter, substituting "that" wherever possible.

8. When dealing with human beings, "who" is the correct pronoun; "that" is never acceptable (as in: I met a man who [not that] once tended Sir Douglas Haig's horse).

9. In quotations, always make clear the identity of the person whom you quote.  Every quote needs a "signature phrase," indicating the identity and/or standing of the person being quoted.

****

January 10, 2007

Bruce Laurie, Artisans into Workers, pp. 113-40

This chapter covers the period from roughly the end of the Civil War to the 1890s.  It conveys information about:

    1. The scope of economic activity
   
    2. Changes in the character and context of work
   
    3. The size and composition of working class
   
    4.  Living standards of workers
   
    5. Hegemonic (i.e., prevailing) ideas about labor and political economy
   
    6. Public policies, programs, and practices related to labor (i.e., legislation, other governmental actions, court decisions)
   
    7. Workers' responses to changing economic and social conditions

*****
January 12, 2007; reading: Laurie, pp.  140-58

Topics discussed today:

1.  Chinese Exclusion; violence and hostility directed at Chinese immigrants; role of Chinese laborers in building the transcontinental railroads.  Comparison of treatment of Chinese and Japanese during the period c. 1880-1924.

2.  Distinctive labor system of the South:  sharecropping and other forms of misuse of agricultural labor; unfree labor (i.e., debt peonage; convict labor) in the postbellum South and its important role in building the roads, railroads, and other components of the "New South"; beginnings of the movement of the cotton textile industry to the South and the role of women in supplying labor.

3.  Beginning of commentary on typical workers' housing and living conditions, late 19th-early 20th century.

******


January 17, 2007; review Laurie, 140-58; read Laurie, pp. 158-75

    Quotes from Laurie:

        *    The Knights looked forward as well as backward

        *    Knighthood may be seen as a middle ground between the individualistic libertarianism of bourgeois America and the collectivism of working-class socialists

        *    [In America] Socialism . . . was so weak because radicalism was so strong. . . . Radicalism became the touchstone of Knighthood’s movement culture.
            (Laurie is using the word “radicalism” in a special context–see pp. 9-13 for his usage).

        *    The extraordinary growth of 1885-86 . . . breached the barricades of race and gender.

        *    The Great Upheaval set free the contradictory forces of ‘solidarity and fragmentation. . . .’

        *    May 1, 1886: ‘it was the workingman’s hour.’

The Knights and:

    ●    Employers

    ●    The trade unions

    ●    Legislation and politics

Zieger says this:  The KOL was less a coherent and agenda-driven labor organization than the repository of the hopes, aspirations, and grievances of large numbers of American workers in the 1880s.  The rapid pace and uneven performance of industrial capitalism created a widely shared sense of grievance and resentment among thousands of workers.  The high-handed and arbitrary ways in which employers increasingly tried to dilute long-standing work practices and to step up the pace of work triggered unrest.  During this deflationary period, wage reductions were frequent.  And underlying discontent with specific workplace issues lay smouldering hostility toward the way in which the emerging industrial regime, with its increasingly hierarchical methods of management and its growing disparities of wealth and poverty, seemed to vitiate America’s promise of justice and equality.
    The Knights of Labor, sometimes fortuitously, tapped into this volatile mixture of grievances, resentments, and mistrust.  Though its leadership might oppose strikes as a method of protest, thousands of men and women, viewing the KOL as a vehicle for their protest, did not hesitate to violate this theoretical injunction.  The Knights’s vision of an egalitarian producer republic that could somehow redirect the headlong rush to corporate capitalism, with all its pathologies and advantages, looked backward to an allegedly simpler and more humane time.  At the same time, in its vision of uniting all workers regardless of craft or gender or race and of adapting republican institutions and civic activism to new conditions the KOL provided a vision of equality and social justice that remains vital today.


January 19, 2007

Daniel Letwin, “Interracial Unionism, Gender, and ‘Social Equality’ in the Alabama Coal Fields, 1878-1908,” Journal of Southern History 61: 3 (August 1995).

1.  According to Letwin, one key reason for the relative success of interracial unionism in the Alabama coal fields was that: a) most of the white miners were Union army veterans, imbued with the idealism of the Civil War fight against slavery; b) most of the black miners were convict laborers and hence posed no threat to white men’s jobs; c) the UMW’s insistence on social equality silenced racially motivated objections to interracial unionism; d) the lack of social interaction between black and white miners removed a potential source of friction.

2.  Letwin argues that interracial unionism among late 19th century Alabama miners: a) was merely one example of a broad pattern of the interracial labor activism that characterized the post-Civil War South; b) was the product of unique economic and demographic circumstances; c) has been exaggerated by wooly-headed historians eager to find a bi-racial “usable past”; d) enabled Alabama, alone among the southern states, to avoid the evils of disfranchisement and segregation that plagued its neighbors.

3.  The United Mine Workers: a) carefully distinguished between support for black workers’ on-the-job rights, which it upheld, and “social equality,” which it disclaimed; b) excluded blacks from membership; c) vigorously fought against the disfranchisement of African Americans; d) refused to permit blacks to hold union offices.

4.  Letwin’s overall point is that: a) opportunities for at least limited interracial labor activism were present even at times and in places otherwise notable for racial intolerance and subordination; b) employers’ racially egalitarian practices provided better opportunities for black workers than did labor activism; c) the role of women as active participants in labor struggles has been neglected by historians; d) black workers, North and South, faced unrelenting racial discrimination in the late 19th century.

5.  According to Letwin, one of the following factors played a key role in the shattering defeat suffered by the UMW in 1908.  Which is it?: a) inter-union struggle with the Knights of Labor, which divided union activists; b) black voters’ support for the Democrats in the November election, which undermined union solidarity; c) the support of state and local government for the coal operators; d) the union’s insistence on social equality.

******

****

Janaury 22, 2007

Below is an outline of topics derived from Laurie.  On Wednesday, we will highlight five topics from it:  syndicalism; the Political Program; dual unionism; voluntarism; and so-called "home grown" socialism.


January 22, 2007; Laurie, Artisans into Workers, 176-98


1.  Dissident labor ideologies of the late 19th century
    A.  Radicalism a la Laurie
    B.  Socialism
            1.  Marxian
            2.  Lassallean
            3.  Home-grown (e.g., Bellamy)
    C.  Anarchism
    D. Syndicalism
2  Character and development of the AFL
    A.  The crafts and the masses
    B.  AFL structure and trajectory
    C.  Doctrines
            1.  “Pure and simple” unionism (business unionism)
            2.  Voluntarism (keeping the state out).  In Europe, strong states, little overt repression; in the US, weak state, much repression.
            3.  Trade autonomy
            4.  “Prudential unionism”–dangers of mass activism, which would invite repression.  Big challenge is to preserve the union.
    D.  Achievements, limitations, prospects, 1886-1900
            Note here particularly AFL racial policies and attitudes re blacks, Asians; women workers; immigrant and unskilled workers and compare with KOL.
  
*******

January 26, 2007.  Reading: Zieger and Gall, AWAU, pp. 1-18

Here are some key terms appearing in today’s reading.  Which ones call for further discussion?

    Scientific management
   
    Welfare capitalism
   
    Five-dollar day
   
    skill
   
    peonage
   
    at will employment
   
    Triangle Shirtwaist fire
   
    Workmen’s compensation
   
    New immigration
   
    melting pot
   
    “wages of whiteness”

******
January 29, 2007  Zieger and Gall, AWAU, 18-32

Again a list of terms with which all students of US labor history should be familiar:

Company unions

"Age of Industrial Violence"

closed shop

industrial unionism

Ludlow

American Federation of Labor

       structure

       ideology

       leadership

       accomplishments and problems

"Yellow Dog" contracts

Labor injunctions

Industrial Workers of the World

International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union

****
January 31, 2007.  Note that when I accessed the Triangle Shirtwaist Fire website today I found that I had to click on the link labeled "Criminal Trial Transcripts" in the bottom righthand corner to get to a full menu of the documents, photos, and other material.

For today's class, I'd like everyone to read a couple of the newspaper accounts of the fire (click on the link "Documents" and scroll down to "Newspaper and Magazine Accounts"}

I'd like everyone also to access and examine the photos (linked under "Sources" from the Triangle Fire home page).  Print a photo and be prepared to tell a story about it.

I encourage you also to browse through the testimonials, letters, transcripts, and other documents.  Students whose last names begin with the letters A-F are assigned My First Job, by Rose Cohen; G-L, Days and Dreams, by Sadie Frown; M-R, Life in the Shop, by Clara Lemlich; and S-Z, The Cooper Union Meeting of 1909 (with Samuel Gompers), The Call.

Finally, peruse the "List of Victims" under the Other Resources link.

----
From perusing the various sources–the first hand accounts, the newspaper accounts, the roster of the victims, and the photographs and cartoons–what statements can safely be made about:

    1.  The character and practices of the garment industry (A-F)
   
    2.  The character and composition of the American working class in the early 20th century
(G-L)
   
    3.  The role of public authorities in monitoring and regulating workplaces    (M-R)
   
    4.  The particular circumstances of female employment at this time (S-Z)

How does the story of the Triangle Shirtwaist fire fit in to what you already know about working conditions and industrial practices in turn-of-the-century America?

***

February 2, 2007.  We discussed the on-line reading "Socialism."

*****
February 5, 2007.  Zieger and Gall, 34-42

    Labor in the decade of the Great War

1.  During the 1910s, tremendous demographic developments reshaped the ethnic  and geographical contours of the working class.

2. What did African Americans expect to find in the North that was lacking in the South? How were they received by northern workers? Dealt with by the federal government?

3. The "Labor Question" was a central concern for all belligerent countries, most definitely including the USA.

4. American workers both supported the war effort and exhibited fierce militancy.

5. Which of these statements is true:

    A) The federal government demonstrated unprecedented support for organized labor.

    B) The federal government was harshly repressive toward organized labor.

6. With respect to women's experience during World War I, the old adage was never truer:  "The more things change[d], the more they stay[ed] the same."

7. The Russian Revolution had powerful repercussions within the United States.

8. The failure of the great steel strike of 1919-20 was a significant turning point in US labor history –and in modern US history generally.

***
February 7, 2007. 

Quiz on Eric Arnesen, "'Like Banquo's Ghost, It Will Not Down':  The Race Question and the American Railroad Brotherhoods, 1880-1920," AHR 99: 5 (Dec. 1994):  1601-33.

1.  According to Arnesen, railroad workers were:  a) among the most exploited and poorly paid of all industrial workers; b) had pride in their skills, experience, and community standing; c) largely new immigrants from Eastern and Southern Europe; d) notable for their distaste for organizing into unions.

2.  One important difference between North and South insofar as railroad work was concerned was that:  a) in the South, blacks were barred entirely from railroad work; b) in the North, blacks led in the creation of unions; c) in the South, blacks were permitted certain jobs denied to black workers in the North, at least until the early 1900s; d) in the North, most railroad jobs were performed by new immigrants.

3.  Arnesen writes insightfully about the ways in which race and ideology intersected in the thinking of white railroaders.  Which of the following statements best captures his argument:  a) White railroaders welcomed men of all races on an equal footing into their unions; b) White railroaders were notorious for their undemocratic views and so their hostility toward black workers is not surprising; c) White railroaders viewed black and immigrant workers as threats to their masculinity and their status as republican citizens; d) As socialists, white railroaders favored racial equality, though in practice they were guilty of job discrimination.

4. Which of the following statements best captures the role of the federal government in the realm of racial aspects of railroad work:  a) since the railroads were privately operated, the federal government played no role in either fostering or resisting the practice of racial discrimination; b) though the federal government made concerted efforts to impose affirmative action on the railroads, blacks continued to encounter discrimination;  c) during World War I, the federal government forced the biracial railroad unions to accept segregation; d) during World War I, some federal agencies, albeit only briefly, sought to promote egalitarian racial labor policies.

5.  With which of the following statements would Eric Arnesen likely agree:  a) while racial discrimination is always wrong, seeking to understand its dynamics provides insights into the world view of dominant, discriminatory groups; b) while racial discrimination is always wrong, it was (and remains) futile to try to change people’s minds through governmental action; c) since black workers showed little interest in railroad work, the racism and discrimination exhibited by railroad employers and white workers is of only antiquarian interest; d) nothing short of public ownership and operation of the railroads would have improved racial practices on early 20th century railroads.

*****
February 9, 2007. 
Reading:  Kenneth Lipartito, "When Women Were Switches:  Technology, Work, and Gender in the Telephone Industry, 1890-1920," American Historical Review 99: 4 (Oct. 1994):  1074-1111.

    Study questions

1.  Don’t worry too much about the first several pages.  These deal with theoretical and historiographical issues relating to labor and technology.  These are important issues but I don’t expect you to grasp fully the issues that Lipartito raises; he is assuming that his readers are pretty familiar with the literature to which he refers (e.g., Braverman, Noble, Montgomery, Edwards-Reich-Gordon).  Can you, however, discern the general overall point that he is making and that the rest of the essay will address?

2.  Why did the Bell Telephone Company (BTC) hire women almost exclusively for switchboard work?  What developments in society at large made it possible for Bell to recruit a sufficient number of women?

3.  Bell’s labor policies both restricted and advantaged women workers.  How so?

4.  What other kinds of occupations in the early 20th century were reserved for females?

5.  Why did the BTC wait so long in moving to replace human operators with electrical switching devices?

6.  How did BTC both create and attempt to ameliorate the often demanding and stressful character of the telephone operators’ jobs?

7.  Why, finally, did BTC move when it did into automatic switching?

8.  Finally, what broader implications or extrapolations relating to the character of work in a technologically advance society, the occupational roles of women, the motives of employers and managers, and the generic relationship between employers and workers are suggested in Lipartito’s essay?

9.  Finally, finally:  what are the most distinctive sources used in this essay?

******

Monday, February 12, 2007.  Examine these statistics.  What are the social meanings behind them?  Which ones merit further investigation or explanation?  Which do you find the most surprising?

1920s--Facts and Figures

1.  In 1920, there are 9 million private autos, one for every 12 people; in 1929, 26.5 million, 1 for every 4.6 people.

2. In 1920, farmers have about 139,000 trucks and 246,000 tractors; in 1930, 900,000 trucks, 920,000 tractors.

3.  Value of radios, radio equipment produced:  1921=$12.9 million; 1929=$388 million.  In 1920, virtually no private ownership of radios; by 1925, 25% of households had one; by 1930, 40%.

4.  In 1920, 38% of households electrified; 1930, 68%.

5.  In the Twenties, horsepower per worker increases by 50% in manufacturing; 60% in mining; 75% in transport.

6.  Output per worker increases by 72%, 1919-1929.

7.  Gainful employment:
    no. employed in mining drops by 80,000
    no. employed in agriculture drops 1 million
    no. employed in manufacturing grows by 100,000
    no. employed in construction grows by 800,000
    no. employed in trade, finance, education, govt. grows by 3.8 million
    no. of females gainfully employed grows by 27.4%

8.  Population trends:
    Immigration from abroad (not inc. W. Hemisphere):
        1910-1914:  1.034 million per year
        1925-29:    304,000

    Between 1915 and 1928, 1.2 million African Americans leave the South for the North and West.

9.  Average hourly wages in manufacturing 66.2 cts. per hour in 1923 to 71 cts. in 1928.  Real hourly wages increase by 7%; real weekly wages by 2% (work week down 15% [59 to 50 hours], 1900-1926).  Share of wages as % of Value-Added in manufacturing falls from 42.1% in 1919 to 36.9% in 1929.

10.  In 1929, 21% of all families make less than $1000 per year; 42 less than $1500; 71% less than $2500.  21.5 million families have no savings; 24,000 families have 34% of all savings.

11.  Strikes
Year   No.   No of Workers   % of employed wage earners on strike
1919   3630  4,160,000        20.8
1922   1112  1,610,000          8.7                   
1925   1301    428,000          2.0
1929     921     289,000         1.2

11.  Union membership:  1920=5,034,000; 1929=3,625,000

12.  Unemployment:  Ranges between 5.2% and 7.7%, 1925-29.

13.  Education:  1890-1924 number of college students increases 352% (cf. 79% general population increase); between 1900 and 1930, increase is 500% (cf. 69% population growth).  Graduate students:  1900=5832; 1930=47,255.  Between 1900 and 1930, an eightfold increase in high school enrollment.  Number of teachers and professors grows 1920-1930 by 41.5% (cf. population growth of 16%).

14.  Life expectancy.  For white females, at birth:  1910=52.54; 1930=62.67.

****

Quiz on Hall, “Disorderly Women”

1.  Hall argues that:

2.  The workers who toiled  in the rayon plant were:

3.  The strike that broke out in March, 1929, was:

4.  Which of the following statements best characterizes the social and cultural perspectives of the rayon strikers:

5.  Which of the following statements best characterizes the public behavior of the rayon strikers, according to Hall:
   
Bonus question

On which of the following kinds of sources did Hall most heavily rely:

******

February 19, 2007.  Assignment is to browse the photo display at

http://www.english.uiuc.edu/maps/depression/photoessay.htm

(Note: If this link doesn’t work, use the link on the website for the February 19 class session in the Schedule of Classes, above).

If these photos (try to ignore the captions) were the only evidence that you had, how would you characterize American life in the 1930s?  What could you say, e.g., about:

The state of the economy?

The demographic make-up of the US population?

Politics in the 1930s?

The role of the federal government in the lives of Americans?

The role of women in American life?

Class conflict in the 1930s?

*****


February 21-23.  Lecture overview of the Crash-Depression era.
   
1.  Note the statistics placed on the website re the scope of the crash and depression

     Shares traded on the NY Stock Exchange
   
        1923–236 million
        1926–451 million
        1927–577 million
        1929–1.1 billion
   
         Market value of shares traded on the NYSE
   
        1925–$27 billion
        1929 (October)–$87 billion
        1933–$18 billion
     
            Average closing value, September, 1929=$366.29 a share
            Average closing value, December, 1932=$96.63 a share
   
            NY Times average of representative stocks: September, 1929=452; July 1932=52
   
         Bank failures
   
        1929–659; $250 million
        1930–1352; $853 million
        1931–2294; $1.7 billion
        1932–1456; $750 million
   
         Industrial production, last quarter, 1930, is 26% below peak level of summer, 1929
   
         Unemployment
   
        April, 1930–3 million
        October, 1930–4 million
        October, 1931–7 million
        October, 1932–11 million
        March, 1933–14 million
   
        Wages and farm income
   
        Industrial wages drop 42%, 1929-33
        Gross farm income (already poor during 1920s) drops by 56%, 1929-33
   
          Other income indicators, 1929-33
   
        National income drops from $87.8 billion to $40.2 billion
        Per capita income drops form %681 to $459
  

2.  Why the Crash?  Both easy and hard to answer.  Easy: a downturn was to be expected; markets are volatile; there had been brief breaks in the market through the summer of 1929.  Hard: Why such a massive sell-off October 23-24?  Why the irreversible downward spiral?  Why didn’t this market “work” the way markets are supposed to–i.e., drive out the speculators, arrive at sensible share prices, and attract capital back in?

3.  Why did the Crash turn into a Depression?  Galbraith specifies five factors:

         Maldistribution of income (low wages, low farm prices and income)
        Bad banking structure (no FDIC, regulation)
        Bad corporate structure
        Problems of international trade and finance (Smoot-Hawley Tariff)
        Poor state of economic intelligence

4.  Why was the Depression so severe?

    ■    It occurred at a time when the old international financial institutions, which Britain had overseen for 200 years, were weakened and in disarray owing to the effects of World War I; and before newer arrangements that depended on US world financial leadership were in place.

    ■    It occurred at a time when older industrial sectors (heavy steel, textiles, mining, railroads), which employed millions, were in relative decline, and at which newer, growth and employment producing industries (e.g., light metals; petrochemicals; modern food processing; plastics) were not yet sufficiently large to take up the slack.

    ■    Note here the uneven course of the depression.  There were significant upticks in the economy, as well as “depressions-within-the-depression,” notably the “Roosevelt Recession” of 1937-39.  See the chart.

5.  Why did it last so long?

        1.  Conservatives say–Meddling by government, which interfered with the normal workings of the market and created uncertainty and political conflict.  The pain of those disadvantaged, while regrettable, is a necessary component of capitalism’s creative destruction. 

        2.  Radicals–Capitalism prone to excess and collapse.  An irrational system always teetering on the verge of chaos.  Survives through exploitation and greed.  The chickens had finally come home to roost.  It’ll take a big war this time to save capitalism’s chestnuts.

        3.  New Deal liberals–The system combines 19th century ideas and complex modern realities.  It needs direction in the form of governmental direction and regulation.  The community needs to mobilize its resources to restore prosperity and to assist those put in need through no fault of their own.  Capitalism is too important to be left entirely to the capitalists.
*****

February 21, 2007

Zieger and Gall, American Workers, American Unions, pp. 50-75

1.  The onset of the Great Depression called into question the corporate-promoted “deal.”  Corporations slashed payrolls, abandoned welfare plans, and imposed more rigorous production standards, thus unilaterally (so it seemed) changing the bargain.  American workers remained committed to high levels of private consumption and improving standards of housing, health, and education.  Since the corporate-sponsored deal of the 1920s now seemed to be abrogated, working people demanded a new deal, one that rested on a revived labor movement and involved a more active and responsive federal government.  Unemployed demonstrations, anti-eviction actions, and strikes flared as the depression deepened.  Working people greeted the election in 1932 of Franklin Roosevelt, with his promise of a new deal, enthusiastically.  They were now determined to build unions and spur the government into action to enable them to resume the march to prosperity and social progress promised in the 1920s.

2.  While our images of the Great Depression are usually ones of desperate, impoverished people, and of pathetic bread lines and soup kitchens, American working people had internalized the corporate and advertising message of the 1920s.  They believed that to be American was to be entitled to a rising standard of living and continually improving conditions.

3.  By 1932-33, corporate leaders such as Henry Ford and political celebrants of the new age of industrial plenty, such as Herbert Hoover, appeared to have no coherent answer to the problems of unemployment and poverty, as witnessed by the harsh and counterproductive repression that greeted the Ford Hunger March and the Bonus March.  They stood discredited in the minds of millions of Americans.

4.  The election of Franklin Roosevelt in 1932 brought hope and optimism, not because of any concrete policies that he advanced but because he was able to project a sense of forward motion and experimentation, and to convey in almost uncanny ways a sense of personal concern for the plight of the unemployed and ill-treated.

5.  The passage of the National Industrial Recovery Act, with its Section 7(a) concerning labor relations, helped to trigger a remarkable wave of union activism, for which the cautious leaders of the AFL were unprepared.

6.  The massive strikes of 1934 brought the country closer to raw, naked class conflict than at any time since (pick a date: 1877; 1894; 1919).

****

Helmbold, “Downward Occupational Mobility,” February 23, 2007

1.  In 25 words or fewer, what is Helmbold’s thesis?

2.  What does Helmbold tell us about working women’s job preferences during the 1930s?

3.  She detects differences between African American women, on the one hand, and “white” women on the other with respect to the strategies they followed in dealing with depression-era conditions.

4.  Helmbold has uncovered some unusual and distinctive sources.  What are they?

5.  Were the conditions that the Great Depression created harder on men or on women?

*****
For February 28, 2007.  Reading from Zieger and Gall, pp. 75-82

Those interested in an important recent development in federal labor law might want to take a look at historian David Brody's article on legislation just passed by the House of Representatives, to wit:  http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2007/03/01/EDGRJN7A9C1.DTL


    Labor Law

Review your knowledge of pre-1935 federal labor law.  Despite organized labor’s claims of victimization at the hands of the pre-New Deal federal government, you can make a good case that every piece of 20th century labor legislation down to 1940 was pro-labor.  Evidence?  Examples?  Complications?

What is the connection between Section 7(a) of the National Industrial Recovery Act and the National Labor Relations, or Wagner, Act?

What are the distinctive features of the Wagner Act–how did it work (or how was it supposed to work)?

It is clear why labor activists in general supported passage of the Wagner Act.  But why did some veteran trade unionists demur?  From the point of view of advocates of a free and autonomous labor movement, what hidden dangers did the Wagner Act approach contain?

How significant was the Wagner Act–and other evidences of federal action in the 1930s–for organized labor’s rebirth in the depression decade?

We’ll get to the racial implications of Wagner and other federal labor legislation a little later.  But keep this topic in mind.

*****
 
March 2, 2007. Reading: Zieger and Gall, 82-103

I.  STRUCTURAL FACTORS IN THE REBIRTH OF THE LABOR MOVEMENT IN THE 1930S

    1.  Homogenization of the industrial working class

    2.  Worker militancy born of the unmet promises of the 1920s

    3.  Widespread discrediting of corporate stewardship

    4.  Favorable political and governmental alignments

    5.  Energetic and farsighted labor leadership; availability of committed radical activists

    II.  CIO-AFL Comparison


    CIO                        AFL

Industrial unionism                Craft unionism

Racial equality                Racial discrimination

Political engagement                Voluntarism

Radical influences                Anti-radicalism


    III.  CIO chronology

October 16, 1935–Lewis slugs Hutcheson

September 1, 1936–CIO unions suspended from AFL

November 3, 1936–FDR Re-elected

December 30, 1936-February 11, 1937–Flint Sit-Down strike

March 2, 1937–Steelworkers Organizing Committee signs contract with US Steel

May 30, 1937–Memorial Day massacre, Chicago

September, 1937–Roosevelt Recession begins
November 22, 1940–Lewis steps down as CIO president; Philip Murray succeeds

June, 1941–Ford Motor Company signs UAW contract

*****
March 5, 2007.  Katznelson, When Affirmative Action Was White

The facts and figures describing the deprivation of African Americans, especially in the South, in the 1930s are pretty shocking.

The character of early New Deal relief and welfare policies, and the processes by which they were applied and implemented, disadvantaged African Americans.  How so?

Even so, however, blacks began to shift their political allegiance to the Democratic party.  How come?

What were the provisions of the Social Security Act, apart from its pension provisions?  Was the SSA color-blind?

What were the racial implications and effects of the New Deal’s trailblazing labor legislation, notably the National Labor Relations and Fair Labor Standards Acts?

Why were northern and liberal legislators, along with President Roosevelt, so quick to accede to the demands of southern Democrats in the House and Senate?

How do these chapters connect with the title of Katznelson’s book?

*******

Study questions for March 7, 2007.  Reading:  Z&G, 104-118


1.  Review the on-line material for March 2 re the creation and early development of the CIO.

2.  Despite the CIO’s early successes, by 1938-39 it seemed to be in retreat.  How come?

3.  Why did the US military build up both pose dangers for the CIO and offer great opportunities?

4.  What role did Communists play in the labor movement during this period?

5.  In the period of pre-war build up in military production, the federal government intruded unprecedentedly into labor-management relations.  True?  Cf. the WWI and WWII experiences.

6.  John L. Lewis is a larger-than-life figure, at no time more so than in this tense and pregnant period.

****

March 9, 2007.  Z&G,  126-43

Although World War II brought a high degree of unity and common effort, wartime strikes were plentiful and divisive.  Why so many strikes?  Are there generalizations to be made about their character and intensity?

What were the purposes of the National War Labor Board?  Why did labor leaders have a love-hate relationship with it?

Here are some terms that students of labor during WWII need to know:

    Maintenance of Membership

     The No-Strike Pledge

     The Little Steel Formula
     
      The Smith-Connally Act

      CIO-PAC

****

March 19, 2007

Quiz on Bruce Nelson, "Organized Labor and the Struggle for Black Equality in Mobile during World War II," Journal of American History  80: 3 (Dec. 1993):  952-88

1. According to Bruce Nelson, the wartime labor shortage in Mobile was in good part "artificial," a result of unwillingness to hire local blacks, who remained underemployed during the early stages of the war.

2. According to Nelson, it is remarkable that in view of the importance of Mobile's ship building and repairing facilities, the federal government made no effort to deal with racial tensions in the workplace


3.
Nelson finds that in Mobile at least, the AFL was far more responsive to the concerns of black workers than was the CIO.

4. The May, 1943, riot in Mobile, though seemingly triggered by the entry of blacks into skilled jobs, had a significant gender component as well.


5. The "dilemma" faced by the CIO Shipyard Workers' union was this: black workers were its most loyal supporters but it was the very presence of blacks in the union that turned whites against Local 18.


****

AMH 3500.  Second take-home exam.  To be handed in Monday, March 26.  Please review the rules for take-home exams and the linked writing instructions on the on-line syllabus.


1.  Discuss the role of the federal government in labor relations during the period of the Great Depression, New Deal, and World War II.

2.  Discuss the experience of either working-class women or African American workers during the period of the Great Depression, New Deal, and World War II.


Note: By the term “discuss,” I mean develop an argument, support it with concrete information, and account for apparently inconvenient or contradictory evidence.  Be sure to assert your argument in the essay’s opening paragraph.


****
March 23, 2007.  This quiz is a bonus opportunity.  We will count and add to your total class quiz score the number of correct answers but the quiz itself will not be added to the total quiz points possible.

Ruth Milkman, "Rosie the Riveter Revisited:  Management's Postwar Purge of Women Automobile Workers," On the Line:  Essays in the History of Auto Work, ed. Nelson Lichtenstein and Stephen Meyer (Urbana and Chicago:  Univ. of Illinois Press, 1989):  129-152


1.  The most important factor in driving women from the auto factories after World War II was:  a) employer hiring policies; b) union indifference; c) women's uninterest in continued industrial employment; d) pro-veteran federal legislation.

2.  Before World War II, women enjoyed relatively few employment opportunities in the auto industry because:  a) employers preferred to hire blacks for low-wage jobs; b) the industry's high-wage profile insured that men would hold most production jobs; c) the physically heavy work characteristic of auto work precluded large-scale employment of women; d) most auto work was highly skilled and thus controlled by powerful male-only craft unions.

3.  During World War II: a) few women were willing to work in auto plants; b) the experiment in female employment was a dismal failure; c) female employment was carefully portrayed as a temporary expedient; d) employers proved eager to employ women as a means of reducing wage levels.

4.  The electrical industry compiled a better record of providing women with industrial employment than did the auto industry because: a) its union was more progressive than the UAW; b) its employers were more enlightened than were the auto executives; c) it had had a long record of female employment before World War II; d)  only kidding--its record was actually worse than auto's.

5.  Which of the following statements about black auto workers after World War II is most accurate:  a) since few blacks were hired during the war, few were laid off after the war; b) since blacks had entered the auto industry in massive numbers before WWII, they were better able to keep their jobs than were the more recently hired women; c) black workers were better able than women workers to keep their new jobs in good part because of the existence of a strong civil rights movement that made impossibly any effort to drive them out of Detroit-area plants; d) blacks retained their positions despite the opposition of the UAW.
****

March 26, 2007.  Ira Katznelson, When Affirmative Action Was White, chapters 4 & 5.

1.  Which of the following statements is true?: a) In the postwar WWI decades, African Americans continued to benefit disproportionately from the enlightened racial practices begun during World War I; b) the weakening of southern political strength during the New Deal years opened up broad opportunities for blacks in the pre-war military; c) segregation and discrimination continued, indeed intensified, in the inter-war military; d) fixated on economic problems associated with the Great Depression, black activists and leaders ignored military matters before Pearl Harbor.

2.  The “Double V” campaign referred to: a) efforts on the part of race leaders to curb Violence and Vice among inner-city blacks; b) the refusal of large numbers of African American men to register for the draft; c) the alliance in Congress among northern (“Vermont”) representatives and their southern (“Virginia”) colleagues to end Jim Crow in the military; d) the linking of defeat of fascism abroad with the claim for equal treatment and civil rights at home.

3.  During World War II, US Army literacy and job training programs: a) excluded African Americans; b) both benefitted African Americans and had the effect of increasing the educational and occupational disparities between whites and blacks; c) were developed over the fierce opposition of such racist southern politicians as Mississippi’s notorious Theodore Bilbo; d) quickly proved a disastrous and expensive failure.

4.  Which of the following statements about the Selective Service Readjustment Act (i.e., the “GI Bill of Rights”) is the most accurate: a) ostensibly non-discriminatory, its provisions and procedures were designed to benefit whites disproportionately; b) under the direction of racist Mississippi Congressman John Rankin, the bill excluded blacks from its provisions; c) historians have over-emphasized the impact and importance of the legislation; d) by creating a highly centralized administrative structure, the act actually furthered racial discrimination.

5.  Katznelson charges that educational and vocational opportunities made available by the GI Bill: a) benefitted blacks more than they did whites; b) in effect discriminated against the under-represented northern and western states; c) were more apparent than real because of Congress’s niggardly funding of the post-war Veterans Administration; d) disadvantaged African Americans in comparison with whites in good part because of the legislation’s provisions for state and local control.

Bonus question:

How does Katznelson’s account of wartime federal legislation and veterans’ benefits connect with his account of New Deal labor and social welfare legislation?

Another bonus question:  Ronald Reagan said "The government doesn't solve problems; the government is the problem."  How might WWII vets have responded?

******
March 30-April 2.  Note that there will be no class on Friday, March 30, owing to my attendance at a History conference.  The syllabus assignments for March 30 and April 2 will both be due on the latter date.  In other words, on April 2 we will consider all of the material in chapter 5 of  Z&G.

Study questions for chapter 5

1.  What was distinctive about the postwar strike wave?  Who won, employers or workers/unions?

2.  Compare and contrast what happened to organized labor in the immediate aftermath of WWII with its experience afte WWI.

3.  Between let's say 1916 (Adamson Act) and 1938 (Fair Labor Standards Act), every example of federal labor legislation had been favorable to unions.  Now however, the tide was turning.  Why did labor unionists hate the Taft-Hartley Act (aka:  Taft-Heartless Act) so passionately?  Why was Congress now so hostile to organized labor?

4.  Compare and contrast the approaches to politics of the AFL and the CIO in the WWII and immediate postwar period.  What did each federation bring to the political table?  To what extent did their agendas and strategies differ?

5.  To what extent--if any--could either federation legitimately claim to "speak" politically for wage-earners generally?

6.  Why did Communism as an ideology and as the basis of an existing political-economic system (i.e., as in the USSR) pose particular problems for labor activists?

7.  Why did the CIO, but not the AFL, have a "Communist problem"?

8.  Was there anything admirable about American Communists in the WWII and immediate postwar period?

9.  What price, if any, did the CIO pay for its ousting of allegedly Communist-oriented unions?

*****
 
April 4 & 6, 2007.  Zieger and Gall, 182-209

1.  By c. 1960, to what extent had the agenda of the labor militants of the 1930s been realized?

2.  What were the most impressive achievements of the post-WWII US labor movement?

3.  What were its most severe and challenging contemporary problems?

4.  If you had been a long-range planner working with AFL-CIO leaders at the time of the merger in 1955, what advice might you have given with reference to prospects, problems, and possibilities for the future?

*****


April 9, Z&G, 229-39.  Labor and politics, 1955-68+

****
April 11–Z&G, 214-20

1.  Differentiate the terms "New Left" and "Old Left," as they relate to labor and politics in the period c. 1930-1973.

2.  In what ways and to what extent did blue collar workers participate in the general social malaise of the 1960s?

3.  The topic:  The US labor movement and US foreign policy as it relates to:

       World War I

       World War II

       The Cold War

       Vietnam

4.  Who was Jay Lovestone and why did people say such nasty things about him?

*****
April 13, Z&G, 220-28

1.  Which of these two titles would be most appropriate for a paper on the leader of the AFL-CIO in the 1950s and 1960s?:

A).  George Meany:  Civil Rights Advocate

B)   George Meany:  Enemy of Black Workers

2.  Who was Herbert Hill and why was he saying all those nasty things about the AFL-CIO?

3.  The UAW's Walter Reuther was a staunch supporter of equal rights for African Americans, right?

4.  How did supporters of the labor movement's record on race respond to DRUM and other critics?

*****


April 16
AMH 3500.  April 16, 2007 Reading:  Michael Honey, “Martin Luther King, Jr., the Crisis of the Black Working Class, and the Memphis Sanitation Strike,” Southern Labor in Transition, 1940-1995, ed.  Robert H. Zieger (University of Tennessee Press, 1997), 146-75

1. Memphis, Tennessee: a) is of little interest historically, since it is a stereotypical “Old South,” mint-and-julep town; b) was notable in the 1960s for the complete disfranchisement of its African American citizens; c) provides a good laboratory for the study of the interaction of civil rights and race-related economic problems; d) endured a lengthy sanitation strike despite the recent (1967) election of a liberal and enlightened mayor.

2.  According to Honey, Martin Luther King, Jr.: a) was an elitist black leader who paid little attention to the economic problems of lower income folks; b) had an astute and prescient [prescient: anticipative; forward-looking] grasp of the connections between economic and civil rights concerns; c) refused to cooperate with organized labor because of its racist practices; d) was becoming increasingly detached from political and economic concerns in the year or so before his death.

3.  Honey describes some of the general demographic and economic tendencies characterizing American life in the 1950s and 1960s.  Which of the following phrases best captures his treatment of this theme insofar as African American workers were concerned?  a) black economic advance stagnates; b) rising proportion of industrial jobs benefits unskilled workers; c) African Americans achieve economic equality with whites; d) ironically, civil rights achievements fragment the black community.

4.  According to Honey, Memphis’s sanitation workers: a) gained little from union recognition; b) organized and won their strike despite the indifference of the national labor movement; c) effectively linked themes of labor rights and civil rights; d) waged their strike with little support from among the city’s African American elites.

5.  Which of the following statements best captures Honey’s understanding of Dr. King’s enduring legacy: a) without economic justice, civil rights advance remains compromised; b) non-violence is the most important lesson to be derived from Dr. King’s life; c) organized labor and civil rights are, in the end, incompatible; d) Dr. King achieved more during his “moderate” pre-1965 phase than he did in his “radical” post-1965 phase.


****

April 18, 2007.  Nancy MacLean, “The Hidden History of Affirmative Action: Working Women’s Struggles in the 1970s and the Gender of Class,” Feminist Studies 25: 1 (Spring 1999): 42-78

According to MacLean:

1.  So-called “Affirmative Action” has largely benefitted white, well-educated, and professional women, rather than working-class women and women of color.

2.  Affirmative Action measures were initially introduced by federal judges and OEO functionaries rather than by working women themselves.

3.  In the 1970s and 1980s, women sought entry into occupations such as the building trades and coal mining primarily because wages were higher and benefits were better than could be found in “traditional” women’s work.

4.  Despite its progressive reputation, the organized labor movement has been the consistent and unrelenting enemy of affirmative action, whether focused on racial or gender issues.

5.  By the term the “hidden history” of affirmative action, MacLean is referring to the government’s refusal to make archival material and court records available to historians.

 
April 20, 2007.  Discussion of Ira Katznelson, When Affirmative Action Was White.

Note that students have already read and discussed the chapters dealing with the 1930-1955 or so period.

We need to help Mr. Duncan and Mr. Bamberg, who are taking a different course with me also this semester, do well on their final exam, which will focus on this book.  See the on-line syllabus for HIS 3942.

First, Nancy MacLean’s view of the “hidden history” of affirmative action.

1.  Tell us about LBJ–who he was, where it came to, what he was up to.

2.  Why does Katznelson believe that the economic and related difficulties being experienced by large numbers of African Americans constitutes a central challenge to American society?

3.  Why doesn’t Katznelson give us a detailed account of the actual origins, implementation, and impact of the affirmative action programs that emerged in the wake of the Civil Rights Acts of the 1960s?

4.  Why is he so sketchy and even vague when it comes to remedial public action to compensate for the processes that he has been documenting in the book?

5.  What is Katznelson’s view of his most important contribution to our understanding, as citizens, of the problems of racial inequality that we face?

6.  What questions would you like to ask Katznelson were he here with us today?

*****

Sessions
April 23, 2007, Z&G, chapter 8.

    Class discussion questions

1.  Since this edition of AWAU was completed, employment in manufacturing in the US has declined by about 3 million jobs.  Today only about 15% of American workers are in the manufacturing sector.

2.  Although the labor movements in almost all economically advanced countries have experienced a decline in membership and influence, nowhere has the erosion in union strength been more pronounced than in the US.

3. Despite its relatively shrinkage in membership and its collective bargaining troubles, organized labor remains a potent force in American politics.

4. Whereas once the labor movement scorned or ignored minorities and women, these groups now constitute its lifeblood.  About 40% of union membership is female.

5.  There are, broadly speaking, two conservative perspectives on the role of the labor movement in modern life.  They are:

    1.  Unions are illegitimate monopolies whose growth and influence in the period c. 1933-
    1968 as the product of unusual historical circumstances and whose demise is to be celebrated.

    2.  Unions, though prone (like all institutions) to abuse, are a useful component of a vibrant civic culture and as such play a worthwhile, if all too often these days partisan, role in American life.

6.  The growing gap between the well-off and others has been a fact of life in America for the past 25 years.  Opinions differ as to whether it is a pernicious, divisive development or a necessary condition in providing incentives for entrepreneurship and economic advance.

7.  In the 1930s old line laborites warned that the seemingly pro-union National Labor Relations Act could (and, some said, would inevitably) become an impediment to organized labor. 

8.  Few issues in recent years have generated such bitterness and division as so-called “free trade” initiatives such as NAFTA and the more recent FTAA program.  Concerns about so-called “globalization” and its impact on US living standards arouse fierce partisan debate.

9.  Whereas for a century the US was among the most strike-prone industrial nations, for the past two decades it has been at the bottom of the league tables.

10.  While this subject is not treated in chapter 8, the response of organized labor to the war in Iraq raises interesting questions and invites historical comparisons.


****
Final exam, AMH 3500.  Spring 2007.

Part A.  Write an essay of about 1500 words (6-7 pp.) on one of the three questions below.  This essay accounts for 70% of the final exam grade.  You may turn the exam in during the scheduled exam period (May 3 at 9:30) or put it at any time before then in the box outside my office door (236 Keene-Flint Hall).

The best essays are ones in which the author arrives at conclusions, states them at the outset, and uses these conclusions as a means of organizing the essay.  Mid-level essays are ones in which the author throws a lot of more or less accurate chronologically organized factual information at the reader.  Poor essays lack direction and are characterized by evasion, misinformation, and careless writing.  Be sure to review the instructions on the on-line syllabus for exam s (see the link on the first page of this syllabus).

    Questions–Write on one of the following:

1.  You have been invited to give a talk to labor activists, union officers, and other supporters and friends of the labor movement on the subject “Race and Labor in Modern [i.e., c.  1870-2007] US History.”  These folks expect you to be frank, fair-minded, and authoritative [authoritative: well-informed, possessing sure grasp of subject–not synonymous with “authoritarian”].  Write out such a talk.

2.  Your subject: the role of the federal government in labor relations.  The time period: That covered by this course (i.e., c. 1870-2007).  Your task:  To write an essay discussing the role the various branches of the federal government in dealing with labor problems and labor relations.

3.  Write an essay on the theme of gender in modern [i.e., 1870-2007] US labor history, remembering that the word “gender” refers to men as well as to women..

    *****

Final exam
Part B:   Answer all ten multiple-choice questions on the attached sheet and staple it to your paper, making sure that your name is on it.  Each question has one, and only one, correct answer.  Each m.c. answer is worth 3 points for a total of 30.

1.  The main point of Ira Katznelson’s book When Affirmative Action Was White is: a) that so-called “affirmative action” is in reality racism in reverse; b) New Deal efforts to intervene in the economy so as to benefit African Americans largely failed; c) key New Deal, World War II, and postwar veterans programs constituted a hitherto unacknowledged “affirmative action for whites”; d) the New Deal broke the hold of previously all-powerful southern white congressional leaders and led to pathbreaking civil rights legislation in the 1930s and 1940s.

2.  In comparing the Knights of Labor with the Industrial Workers of the World, which of the following statements is the most supportable?:  a) Both were socialist organizations; b) The Knights of Labor grew directly out of the failure of  the IWW to recruit immigrant workers; c) Both organizations, though they differed in ideology,  favored organizing workers regardless of skill, race, or gender; d) Both organizations favored political action, as opposed to strikes and boycotts, as the primary means to achieve their goals.

3.  Which of the following statements about the role of immigrants in the American labor force during the period ca. 1880-1920 is the most supportable:  a) so-called “new” immigrants played little role in the industrial labor force; b) the  “Americanization” of immigrants was a contested process; c) immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe had little involvement with  labor unions or social protest; d) since the new immigrants shared the religious and ethnic background of the so-called “old” immigrants, employers had little trouble in acculturating them to industrial labor.

4.  Which of the following statements about the relationship between organized labor and African American workers is the most supportable?  a)  Since the major national labor organizations, from the 19th century onward, refused to recruit or represent black workers, African Americans have been resolutely anti-union; b) In the twentieth century, black workers have been little involved with organized labor largely because most have worked in rural and agricultural pursuits; c) Since at least the late 19th century, the labor movement has had a troubled and ambivalent relationship to African American workers; d) Over the past sixty years, unions have had much success in organizing black workers but African Americans have been hostile toward  the political activities of their unions.

5.  Which of the following statements about labor legislation in American history is the most valid:  a) the original purpose of the Wagner, or National Labor Relations Act, was to encourage collective bargaining; b) before the 1930s, the federal courts usually intervened in labor disputes to protect workers and support collective bargaining; c) employers have bitterly resisted most labor legislation, notably the Wagner Act, the Taft-Hartley Act, and the Smith-Connally Act; d) “Right-to-Work” laws seek to provide employment for all able-bodied workers.

6.  The CIO: a) avoided involving organized labor in political activities; b) achieved major breakthroughs in organizing mass production workers; c) replicated the AFL’s concentration on organizing skilled workers; d) was taken over by Communist elements in the great purges of 1949-50.

7.  During World War II, the federal government:  a) outlawed strikes; b) tried unsuccessfully to crush the labor movement; c) attempted with considerable success to elicit labor leaders’ support of the war effort; d) avoided the mistakes of World War I by refusing to involve itself in labor relations problems.

8.  Which of the following statements about the political behavior of American workers in the period since the mid-1930s is the most accurate:  a) They have tended to support the Democratic Party although the GOP has made significant inroads into the so called “labor vote”; b) Since the advent of new labor leadership in 1995, the AFL-CIO has drastically reduced its political involvement; c) Since blue collar work has declined so massively, working people no longer play a distinctive political role; d) Gender has historically been a more significant factor in workers’ voting patterns than has either class or race.

9.  Which of the following statements about the role of gender in American labor history is the most supportable:  a) There has been a steady decrease in the proportion of women employed outside the home since at least the onset of the Great Depression; b) After World War II, women were remarkably successful in retaining the jobs they had gained in industry on a “temporary” wartime basis; c) Despite important gains associated with Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, women continue to experience discrimination and harassment in many workplaces ; d) Victimized by employers and unions alike, women have proven disproportionately susceptible to the lure of authoritarian political movements.

10.  Which of the following statements about the general character and direction of organized labor in the period ca. 1980-present is the most supportable:  a) Declining membership, weakened political influence, hostile employers, and a non-union friendly legal environment have posed sharp challenges to the once-great US labor movement; b) Organized labor has waged a massive and on the whole successful campaign to expand its membership; c)  Organized labor has suffered at the hands of government by virtue of its stubborn opposition to U.S. foreign policy; d) so-called  “globalization” has actually enhanced the power, influence, and membership totals of US industrial unions.

                                  

Name:_______________

 1._______

2.________

3.________

4.________

5.________

6.________

7.________

8.________

9.________

10.________