Power versus Peer Case study: Detroit Black English Vernacular (BEV) (Walt Wolfram)
Status versus SolidarityPattern for contracting and deleting of the copula (be)
She real nice.
She nurse.
They out there.
We getting beat.I'm a good man.
Yesterday he was good.
I want to be bad.
I know what they are.
He not home, is he?
He is so bad.
What's....? That's....I. Total of deletion and contraction by social class.
100% . . . . . 79.8% . . 77.4% 81.9% 80% yyyyyy 72.6% 74.2% yyyyyy yyyyyy yyyyyy yyyyyyy yyyyyy yyyyyy yyyyyy 60% yyyyyy yyyyyyy yyyyyy yyyyyy yy56.9% yyyyyy yyyyyyy yyyyyy yy40.1% nnnnnn 40% yyyyyy yyyyyyy yyyyyy nnnnnn nnnnnn yyyyyy yyyyyyy yyyyyy nnnnnn nnnnnn 20% yyyyyy yyyyyyy yy10.9% nnnnnn nnnnnn yyyyyy nnn4.7% nnnnnn nnnnnn nnnnnn UMW UMB LMB UWB LWB II. Percentage of deletions according to sex and social class
. Males Females UMB 6.4% 3.1% LMB 16.4% 5.3% UWB 45.3% 28.7% LWB 66.3% 47.5% III. Percentage of deletions by age and social class
. 10-12 yrs. 14-17 yrs. Adult UMB 6.2% 5.1% 3.1% LMB 18.0% 8.2% 6.4% UWB 53.5% 30.3% 27.4% LWB 64.7% 67.7% 38.4%