|
Phillip E. Wegner Marston-Milbauer Eminent Scholar University Research Foundation Professor Department of English University of Florida P.O. Box 117310 Gainesville, FL 32611-7310
Turlington Hall 4115 Education: Ph.D. from the Literature Program, Duke University, 1993 B.A. in Honors English, summa cum laude, California State University, Northridge, 1986 Selected Publications Recent Courses Recent Conferences Organized The Summer Institute A Few Useful Links One could say that what identifies philosophy is not the rules of a discourse, but the singularity of an act. It is this act that the enemies of Socrates called: "the corruption of young people ". And because of that, as you know, Socrates was sentenced to death. "To corrupt young people" is after all not a bad name for the philosophical act. If you properly understand "to corrupt". Here "to corrupt" means to teach the possibility of refusing any blind submission to established opinions. To corrupt is to give to young people some means of changing their minds about all social norms; to corrupt is to substitute discussion and rational criticism for imitation, and even, if the question is a question of principles, to substitute revolt for obedience. But this revolt is neither spontaneous nor agressive inasmuch as it is a consequence of principles and rational critics. In the poems of the great trench poet Arthur Rimbaud we find the strange expression: "Logical Revolts". That is probably a good definition of the philosophical act. Alain Badiou Last revised: August 3, 2012 |
Eduardo Galeano, The Book of Embraces My friend the Angel climb'd up from his station into the mill; I remain'd alone, & then this appearance was no more, but I found myself sitting on a pleasant bank beside a river by moonlight, hearing a harper who sung to the harp; & his theme was: 'The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, & breeds reptiles of the mind." William Blake, The Marriage of Heaven & Hell
|