Seminar in Political Socialization and
Cognition
POS 6247 Section 8704 (Thursdays
8:30 am to 11:35 am, Matherly 6)
Spring 2007
Professor Martinez
Office: Anderson 211 Office Hours*: Tues. 9:30
am - 11:30 am; Tues. and Thurs.
2:30 pm - 4:15
pm.
The goal for the seminar is to review the
literature
on political socialization, social influence, and political cognition
with
a view understanding toward how useful these studies are for
formulating
questions for further research in political science. Each week, the
seminar
will review and discuss selected readings on various topics; some of
those
readings will be classics, others are simply examples of contemporary
studies
in social psychology or political science which use psychological
concepts.
Requirements: Attendance and
Participation.
The weekly meetings of the seminar should be viewed as opportunities
for
the exchange of ideas among scholars. You may, on occasion, be able to
tell that I am the leader of the seminar, but its overall success
depends
on the informed participation of everyone. Each student is expected to
have completed the readings for the week, and to have something to say
about those readings when seminar begins. Ideally, the focus of
our discussion will lead to the application of the concepts in the
readings in building possible research agendas for the seminar
participants.
Weekly Papers: Each student will prepare a
paper
which addresses some theoretical or methodological concern in that
week's
reading. These papers may be critiques of one or more of the readings,
or may offer some theoretical insight which builds on the readings for
the week. They should be about 500-700 words, or one physical
single-spaced
page. These papers are due by noon the day before seminar, and
should
be delivered to the class listserv by email to
spring-8704-l@lists.ufl.edu .
(Please
send text only, and don't ever send a Microsoft Word
attachment.) They
will become the basis for our discussions during seminar.
Students also will be required to complete two of the
following:
- Term Paper: Students who select this
option
will
write
a literature review, research proposal, thesis or dissertation
(pre)proposal
worked out in consultation with Martinez. I expect most of these papers
will be about fifteen to twenty double spaced pages. You are required
to
use the format described in The Style Manual for Political Science.
- Leading a Seminar meeting.
Students who select this option must inform the instructor by January
25 which week they will lead. Responsibilities for the leader
include revision of the reading list for that week (in consultation
with the instructor), reviewing others' weekly essays, organizing the
discussion of the readings, integrating others' comments into the
discussion, and providing a recap/overview of the literature at the end
of the seminar, including research questions that emanate (or have
emanated from) that week's readings.
- Final Exam: The Department encourages
final
exams as
preparations for Ph.D. qualifying exams and M.A. comprehensive exams.
The
final exam in this seminar will be comparable in format to a Ph.D.
qualifying
exam in Political Behavior. There will be one take home question, and
answers
will be limited to five double spaced typewritten pages (normal font
and
margins). I will send the exam question to you (by email) at noon
on Tuesday, May 1, and your response is due back to me by noon,
Wednesday, May 2.
Final grades will be assessed by the following evidence:
- Weekly papers and seminar preparedness 1/3
- Two of the following:
- Term Paper 1/3
- Leading a Seminar Meeting 1/3
- Final Exam 1/3
I have asked the local bookstores to order
Sears, David O., Leonie Huddy, and Robert Jervis. 2003. Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology.
New York: Oxford University Press.
January 18: Overview: Are Political Scientists and Psychologists
Talking Past One
Another?
- Simon, Herbert A. 1985. Human Nature in Politics: The Dialogue of
Psychology
with Political Science.. American Political Science Review 79:
293-304.
- Sniderman, Paul M. Richard A. Brody, and Philip E. Tetlock.
1991. Reasoning
and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. New
York:
Cambridge. Chapter 1 and 2.
- Sears, David O., Leonie Huddy, and Robert Jervis. 2003. "The
Psychologies Underlying Political Psychology." Pp. 3-16 in Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology,
edited by D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, and R. Jervis. Oxford ; New York:
Oxford University Press.
- Lau, Richard R. 2003. "Models of Decision Making." Pp. 19-59 in
Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, edited by D. O. Sears, L.
Huddy, and R. Jervis. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press.
- Mutz, Diana C. Paul M. Sniderman, and Richard A. Brody.
1996.
Political
Persuasion: The Birth of a Field of Study. In Political Persuasion
and
Attitude Change.
January 25: Groups:
Conformity and Obedience (Who cares what other people think?)
- Asch, S. E. 1955. "Opinions and Social Pressure." Scientific American 193 (5): 31-35.
- Newcomb, Theodore M. 1970. Attitude Development as a Function of
Reference
Groups: The Bennington Study. In Learning About Politics. Ed. Roberta
S. Sigel. New York: Random House.
- Alwin, Duane F. 1992. Political
Attitudes over the Life Span: The
Bennington
Women after Fifty Years. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Chapters
1-4, 9.
- Beck, Paul A. 2002. "Encouraging Political Defection: The Role of
Personal Discussion Networks in Partisan Desertions to the Opposition
Party and Perot Votes in 1992." Political
Behavior 24 (4, Dec): 309-337.
- Huddy, Leonie. 2003. "Group Identity and Political Cohesion." Pp.
511-558 in Oxford Handbook of
Political Psychology, edited by D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, and R.
Jervis. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Monroe, Kristen Renwick, James Hankin and Renée Bukovchik
Van Vechten.
2000. The Psychological Foundations of Identity Politics. Annu.
Rev. Polit. Sci. 2000. 3:419-447.
February 1: The
Family
as Group Influence on Political Learning (Mommy, have you seen my
efficacy?)
- Almond, Gabriel A. and Sidney Verba. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and
Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University
Press. Chapter _.
- Easton, David and Jack Dennis. 1967. The Child's
Acquisition of Regime
Norms: Political Efficacy. American Political Science Review
61 (1, March): 25-38.
- Jennings, M. Kent and Richard G. Niemi. 1968. "The Transmission
of Political Values from Parent to Child." American Political Science Review
62: 169-184.
- Searing, Donald D., Joel J. Schwartz, and Allen E. Lind. 1973.
The Structuring
Principle: Political Socialization and Belief Systems. American
Political
Science Review 67: 415-32.
- Dalton, Russell. 1980. 'Reassessing Parental Socialization:
Indicator Unreliability
Versus Generational Transfer. American Political Science Review 74:
421-31.
- Stoker, Laura and M. Kent Jennings. 1995. "Life-Cycle Transitions
and Political
Participation: the case of marriage." American Political Science
Review
89: 421-434.
- McDevitt, M. and S. Chaffee. 2002. "From Top-Down to Trickle-up
Influence: Revisiting Assumptions About the Family in Political
Socialization." Political
Communication 19 (3, Jul-Sep): 281-301.
February 8: Adult Groups
and Social Interaction in Political Learning (Is politics a contagious
disease?)
- Jennings, M. Kent and Gregory B. Markus. 1977. The Effects of
Military
Service on Political Socialization.. American Political Science
Review 71:
131-147.
- Finifter, Ada W. 1974. "Friendship Group as a Protective
Environment for Political Deviants." American Political Science Review
68 (2): 607-625.
- Wald, Kenneth D., Dennis E. Owen, and Samuel S. Jr Hill. 1988.
"Churches as Political Communities." American
Political Science Review 82 (2): 531-548.
- Mutz, Diana C. and Jeffrey J. Mondak. 2006. "The Workplace as a
Context for Cross-Cutting Political Discourse." Journal of Politics 68 (1,
February): 140-155.
- Huckfeldt, Robert, Eric Plutzer, and John Sprague. 1993.
"Alternative Contexts of Political Behavior - Churches, Neighborhoods,
and Individuals." Journal of Politics 55 (2, May): 365-381.
February 15. Does
Political Socialization Last? Does it Matter? (Do kids ever really grow
up?)
- Sears, David O. and Carolyn L. Funk. 1999.
"Evidence
of the
Long-Term Persistence of Adults' Political Predispositions" Journal
of Politics 61 (1, February): 1-28.
- Jennings, M. Kent. 1987. Residues of a Movement: The Aging of the
American
Protest Movement. American Political Science Review 81: 367-82.
- Sigel, Roberta S. 1989. Adult Political Learning: A Lifelong
Process. In
Political Learning in Adulthood. Ed. Roberta S. Sigel. Chicago:
University
of Chicago Press. pp. 458-71.
- McFarland, Daniel A. and Reuben J. Thomas. 2006. "Bowling Young:
How Youth Voluntary Associations Influence Adult Political
Participation." American
Sociological Review 71 (3, June): 401-425.
- Sapiro, Virginia. 2004. "Not Your Parents' Political
Socialization:
Introduction for a New Generation." Annual
Review of Political Science
7: 1-23.
February 22:
Cognition
and Consistency (Is consistency the hob-goblin of little
minds?)
- Converse, Philip E. 2000. Assessing the Capacity of
Mass
Electorates. Annu.
Rev. Polit. Sci. 2000. 3:331-353.
- Sullivan, John L., James E. Piereson, and George E. Marcus. 1978.
"Ideological Constraint in the Mass Public: A Methodological Critique
and Some New Findings." American
Journal of Political Science 22: 233-249.
- Goren, Paul. 2004. "Political Sophistication and Policy
Reasoning: A Reconsideration." American
Journal of Political Science 48 (3, July): 462-478.
- Sniderman, Paul et al. 1991. Values under Pressure:
AIDS
and Civil
Liberties. in Reasoning and Choice, pp. 31-57.
- Sniderman, Paul et al. 1991. The Principle-Policy
Puzzle: the
Paradox of American racial attitudes. in Reasoning and Choice,
pp.
58-69.
- Feldman, Stanley. 2003. "Values, Ideology, and the
Structure of Political Attitudes." Pp. 477-508 in Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology,
edited by D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, and R. Jervis. New York: Oxford
University Press.
- Jacoby, William G. 2006. "Value Choices and American Public
Opinion." American Journal of
Political Science 50 (3, July): 706-723.
March 1: Ambivalence (Sometimes you feel like a nut, sometimes
you don't)
- Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature
and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University
Press. Chapters 1, 4, and 5.
- Alvarez, R. Michael and John Brehm. 1995. "American Ambivalence
Towards Abortion Policy - Development of a Heteroskedastic Probit Model
of Competing Values." American
Journal of Political Science 39 (4, November): 1055-1082.
- Craig, Stephen C., James G. Kane, and Michael D. Martinez. 2002.
"Sometimes You Feel Like a Nut, Sometimes You Don't: Citizens'
Ambivalence About Abortion." Political
Psychology 23 (2, June): 285-301.
- Craig, Stephen C., Michael D. Martinez, and James G. Kane. 2005.
"Ambivalence and Response Instability: A Panel Study." Pp. 55-71 in Ambivalence and the Structure of Political
Opinion, edited by S. C. Craig and M. D. Martinez. New York:
Palgrave Macmillan.
- Huckfeldt, Robert, Jeannette Morehouse Mendez, and Tracy Osborn.
2004. "Disagreement,
Ambivalence, and Engagement: The Political Consequences of
Heterogeneous Networks." Political
Psychology 25 (1, February): 65-95.
- Basinger, Scott J. and Howard Lavine. 2005. "Ambivalence,
Information, and Electoral Choice."
American Political Science Review 99 (2, May): 169-184.
March 8: Attribution and Prejudice (The Devil made me do it, but
you did it
yourself!)
- Duckitt, John. 2003. "Prejudice and Intergroup Hostility." Pp.
559-600 in Oxford Handbook of
Political Psychology, edited by D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, and R.
Jervis. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Nail, P. R., H. C. Harton, and B. P. Decker. 2003. "Political
Orientation and Modern Versus Aversive Racism: Tests of Dovidio and
Gaertner's (1998) Integrated Model." Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology 84 (4, April): 754-770.
- Iyengar, Shanto. 1989. How Citizens Think About National
Issues:
A Matter
of Responsibility. American Journal of Political Science 33
(4):
878-900.
- McGraw, Kathleen M. 1991. Managing Blame - an
Experimental
Test of the Effects of Political Accounts. American
Political
Science Review 85: (4, December) 1133-1157.
- Iyengar, Shanto. 1987. Television-news and
Citizens
Explanations
of National Affairs. American
Political Science Review 81:
(3, September) 815-831.
March 22: Persuasion (My mind is
made up!)
- Sniderman, Paul et al. 1991. The American Dilemma:
The Role
of Law as a Persuasive Symbol. in Reasoning and Choice, pp.
206-222.
- Sniderman, Paul et al. 1991. Ideology and Issue
Persuadability:
Dynamics of Racial Policy Attitudes. in Reasoning and Choice,
pp.
223-243.
- McGraw, Kathleen M. 2003. "Political Impressions:
Formation and Management." Pp. 394-432 in Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology,
edited by D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, and R. Jervis. Oxford ; New York:
Oxford University Press.
- Mondak, Jeffrey J., Diana C. Mutz, and Robert Huckfeldt.
1996.
Persuasion
in Context: The Multilevel Structure of Economic Evaluations. In
Political
Persuasion and Attitude Change.
- Chaffee, Steven H. And Rajiv Nath Rimal. 1996. Time of Vote
Decision and
Openness to Persuasion. In Political Persuasion and Attitude Change.
- Lau, Richard R., Richard A. Smith, and Susan T. Fiske.
1991.
Political
beliefs, policy interpretations, and political persuasion. Journal
of
Politics 53 (3, August): 644-75.
- Hodson, G. and R. M. Sorrentino. 2003. "Uncertainty Orientation
in the
Group Context: Categorization Effects on Persuasive Message
Processing." Journal of Social
Psychology 143 (3, June): 291-312.
March 29: Mass Media and Public Consciousness (Is that an
oxymoron?)
- Kinder, Donald R. 2003. "Communication and Politics in an
Age of Information." Pp. 357-393 in Oxford
Handbook of Political Psychology, edited by D. O. Sears, L.
Huddy, and R. Jervis. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press.
- Zaller, John. 1996. The Myth of Massive Media Impact Revived: New
Support
for a Discredited Idea. In Political Persuasion and Attitude Change.
- Iyengar, Shanto. 1990. Shortcuts to Political Knowledge:
The Role
of Selective
Attention and Accessibility. In Information and Democratic
Processes.
pp. 160-85.
- Miller, Joanne M. And Jon A. Krosnick. 1996. News Media
Impact on
the Ingredients
of Presidential Evaluations: A Program of Research on the Priming
Hypothesis.
In Political Persuasion and Attitude Change. pp. 79-100.
- Krosnick, Jon A. and Laura A Brannon. 1993. "The Impact of
the
Gulf War
on the Ingredients of Presidential Evaluations: Multidimensional
Effects
of Political Involvement." American Political Science Review
87:
963-75.
- Mutz, Diana C. and Byron Reeves. 2005. "The New Videomalaise:
Effects of Televised Incivility on Political Trust." American Political Science Review
99 (1, February): 1-15.
April 5: Cognitions
and Choice (Now, what do you think?)
- Jones, Bryan D. 1999. Bounded Rationality. Annu.
Rev. Polit. Sci. 2:297-321.
- Sniderman, Paul et al. 1991. Reasoning Chains.
in Reasoning
and Choice, pp.70-92.
- Taber, Charles S. 2003. "Information Processing and Public
Opinion." Pp. 433-476 in Oxford
Handbook of Political Psychology, edited by D. O. Sears, L.
Huddy, and R. Jervis. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press.
- Kuklinski, James H., Robert C. Luskin, and John Bolland. 1991.
Where is
the Schema? Going Beyond the 'S' Word in Political Psychology..
American Political
Science Review 85: 1341-1356.
- Lodge, Milton and Ruth Hamill. 1993. A Partisan Schema for
Information
Processing. Experimental Foundations of Political Science. pp. 97-118.
- Quattrone, George A. and Amos Tversky. 1993. Contrasting
Rational
and Psychological
Analyses of Political Science. In Experimental Foundations of
Political
Science. pp. 159-84.
- Gerber, Alan and Donald Green. 1999.
Misperceptions
about Perceptual
Bias. Annu.
Rev. Polit. Sci. 2:189-210.
April 12:.
Affect
and Choice (I like you, so I'll think about it.)
- Lodge, Milton and Patrick Stroh. 1993. Inside the Mental
Voting
Booth:
An Impression Driven Process of Candidate Evaluation.. In Explorations
in Political Psychology. pp. 225-263.
- Herstein, John A. 1993. Keeping the Voter's Limits in Mind:
A
Cognitive
Process Analysis of Decision-Making in Voting.. In Experimental
Foundations
of Political Science. pp. 129-58.
- Ottati, Victor C. and Robert S. Wyer Jr. 1993. Affect and
Political Judgment..
In Explorations in Political Psychology. pp. 296-320.
- Chubb, John E., Michael G. Hagen, and Paul M. Sniderman.
1991. Ideological
Reasoning. in Reasoning and Choice, pp. 140-163.
- Chong, Dennis. 1996. Creating Common Frames of Reference on
Political Issues.
In Political Persuasion and Attitude Change. pp. 195-224.
- Wendy M. Rahn, John H. Aldrich, Eugene Borgida.
1994.
Individual
and Contextual Variations in Political Candidate Appraisal. American
Political Science Review 88 (1, March): 193-199.
April 19:
Emotions and Choice . (I'm mad as Hell, so let me think about
it.)
- Marcus, George E. 2003. "The Psychology of Emotion and Politics."
Pp. 182-221 in Oxford Handbook of
Political Psychology, edited by D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, and R.
Jervis. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press.
- Conover, Pamela Johnston and Stanley Feldman. 1986. Emotional
Reactions
to the Economy: I'm Mad As Hell and I'm Not Going to Take It Anymore..
American Journal of Political Science 30 (1, February): 50-78.
- Marcus, George. 1988. The Structure of Emotional Response. American
Political Science Review 82: 737-62.
- Marcus, George E. and Michael B. MacKuen. 1993. Anxiety,
Enthusiasm, and
the Vote: The Emotional Underpinnings of Learning and Involvement
during
Presidential Campaigns. American
Political Science Review
87:
672-85.
- Masters, Roger D. and Denis G. Sullivan. 1993. 'Nonverbal
Behavior and
Leadership: Emotion and Cognition in Political Information Processing.
In Explorations in Political Psychology. pp. 150-182.