This is just a brief remark on Stapp's last reply.

The fundamental problem in urging that Quantum Mechanics has some relevance to the problem of consciousness in the fashion that Stapp wants to urge it does is to show that the vocabulary of Quantuam Mechanics commits us to thinking that every event is a mental event.

Stapp thinks that some logical differences between Quantum Mechanics and Classical Mechanics makes for a difference in whether the predicates they deploy are mental or non-mental, but this is just a basic, elementary mistake.  What matters is what concepts events (or objects) are subsumed under, not the logical structure of the theory.  There are no psychological predicates deployed in either Classical or Quantum Mechanics.