return to home page
Research Interests

full CV here


My research is on popular politics and citizen empowerment. I study the development of democracy and the creation of a more just society, focusing upon the role of average citizens in those processes. My first book, The Political Ecology of the Modern Peasant, (Johns Hopkins, 1994) was on popular mobilization in the effort to create a more just and humane society, looking specifically at Costa Rica and Nicaragua and studying political mobilization among peasants. The forms of mobilized politics I studied included peasant involvement in revolution and non-violent reformist political action. The Political Ecology suggests a theory for understanding popular mobilization among the peasantry: it argues that peasants blend individual self-interest with concerns about community in a manner that makes the two forms of motivation reinforce each other. Being a responsible member of a community is also in an individual's self-interest. The theory in this book has implications far beyond Central America and far beyond peasant politics. It provides broad outlines about how popular mobilization can help create a better and more fair human society. The book won the American Political Science Association Transformational Politics Section Best Book Award for a book that points toward ways that we can transform our society.

As Latin America democratized, I  began to study citizen involvement in politics through democratic procedures and institutions. Again, the focus has been upon popular politics and popular perceptions and upon how citizens can empower themselves through political action. My second book, co-authored with Lawrence C. Dodd, is Learning Democracy: Citizen Engagement and Electoral Choice in Nicaragua, 1990-2001, (University of Chicago Press, 2005) speaks both to the field of comparative politics and to the field of American politics and shows how citizens can use reasoned vote choice to end war, change their government, and begin a transition toward capitalism and liberal democracy. Learning Democracy offers to American politics an application of two theories of citizen vote choice, Morris Fiorina's theory of retrospective voting and Sniderman, Brody, and Tetlock's theory of prospective voting. Learning Democracy combines these theories to show how the citizens of Nicaragua engaged in thoughtful, reflective vote choice across three elections in 1990, 1996, and 2001. Citizens used retrospective and prospective thinking to accomplish an electoral revolution and a regime change from socialism and a command economy to liberal democracy and a capitalist economy. To the field of comparative politics Learning Democracy illustrates the limitations of previous theories of democratization and shows how these theories have created expectations that are too confined to include or even imagine the democratization process currently underway in Nicaragua. Learning Democracy proposes a new theory of democratization that centralizes the role of citizen choice and the capacities of average citizens to engage in reflective thinking processes that resemble the processes of vote choice made by citizens in older and more established democracies.

My third book, Social Capital in Developing Democracies:  Nicaragua and Argentina Compared,  is newly out with Cambridge University Press, 2010.  (http:www.cambridge.org/us/catalogue/ catalogue.asp?isbn= 0521140846).  Social Capital continues my focus upon popular politics and upon the relationship between popular politics and democratization.  It contrasts the kind of social capital created in Nicaragua by Sandinismo with that created in Argentina by Peronism.  The contrast allows us to examine two different kinds of mass movements, each of which has become an electoral party today.  Sandinismo created horizontal ties and bridging social capital which enhances democratization in Nicaragua while Peronism created vertical ties and bonding social capital, undermining Argentina's democratic development.  In view of historical and quantitative data demonstrating high social capital in Nicaragua and low social capital in Argentina, Social Capital in Developing Democracies then visits the question of how Argentine democracy can be developing in the context of such low social capital.  I argue in Part III of this book that Argentina's democracy is developing upon the basis of strong institutions, particularly the formal institutions of state and that these can represent an alternative resource for democratization in the absence of bridging social capital.  The book concludes that social capital makes democracy work better but that, in the absence of social capital, democracy can develop anyway upon the basis of institutional capital.

Current Research

I am currently working on two new projects. 

In the spring semester of 2008 I was a Fulbright Fellow at the University of Buenos Aires in Argentina.  During that time I finished the research for a new book entitled Democracy, Executive Power and the Welfare State in Argentina.  This book scrutinizes the seventeen year period from the initial return to democracy in December, 1983 until the end of the Menem presidency in 1999.  Those seventeen years saw the establishment of democracy in Argentina and the achievement of civilian control over the military.  These early successess were followed by extensive privatization of state-run companies and services and a significant reform of the state to downsize its responsibilities to society.  Democracy, Executive Power and the Welfare State looks at the role of national institutions in these major political and economic reforms, concentrating upon the role of the presidency and the legislature in the reforms.  The theoretical framework for this project draws upon the delegative democracy argument of Guillermo O'Donnell and upon the literature of American politics that concentrates on the power of the presidency both within and beyond times of crisis. In order to place the Argentine experience in comparative perspective, this projects looks at the behavior of powerful executives in the advanced industrial democracies, including the United States, France, Germany and Britain and in the Latin American case of Chile.  The data for this research are qualitative and quantitative.  They include extensive interviews with political elites in Argentina (former legislators, former members of the cabinet,  labor leaders, and provincial political leaders) and an events data base which covers executive decrees issued in Argentina across the twentieth century, Congressional response to those decrees, and press coverage of the decrees.

An ongoing co-authored project constitutes the second phase of my work with Lawrence Dodd. Phase one of the work culminated in the publication of our co-authored book, Learning Democracy, (Chicago, 2005). This second phase has benefitted from a new grant from the National Science Foundation to study the 2006 election in Nicaragua. In addition to continuing our study of citizen electoral opinion as democracy matures in Nicaragua, this second phase includes two new dimensions of the study of Nicaraguan democracy. The first of these dimensions is a focus upon the development of Nicaragua's legislature and the second involves the study of local level politics, capturing political and electoral dynamics at the level of municipalities. This second phase of the project has involved extensive new field research in Nicaragua.  I visited Nicaragua multiple times in 2006, 2007, and 2008.  During these field visits I interviewed current and former legislators from all major parties and mayors in half of the municipalities in eight departments nationwide.  These were the departments of Leon, Chinandega, Esteli, Matagalpa, Boaco, Chontales, Rivas and Granada.  We are continuing to gather data on Nicaragua's electoral process at both the national and municipal levels.

Selected Publications

books

1. The Political Ecology of the Modern Peasant:  Calculation and Community,
The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994 (selected for Best Book Award, Transformational Politics Section, American Political Science Association and for Outstanding Book Award, Choice academic magazine)

2. Learning Democracy: Citizen Engagement and Electoral Choice in Nicaragua, 1990-2001, with Lawrence C. Dodd, The University of Chicago Press, 2005.

3. Social Capital in Developing Democracies:  Nicaragua and Argentina Compared, Cambridge University Press, 2010.

 refereed articles

1. “Poverty and Political Empowerment:  Local Citizen Political Participation as a Path toward Social Justice in Nicaragua,” Public Policy Forum, December, 2010, Vol 1, # 2010

2. "Single-Party Predominance in an Unconsolidated Democracy:  The Example of Argentina," Perspectives on Politics, December, 2009

3. "Nicaragua:  Progress Amid Regress?" with Lawrence Dodd, Journal of Democracy, July, 2009

4. "The Authoritarian Executive? Horizontal and Vertical Accountability in A New Democracy: A Nicaraguan Perspective," Latin American Politics and Society, Summer, 2006

5. "Fascism or Revolution?" The Politics of the Rural Poor in New Democracies, International Political Science Review, April, 2006 (A longer version of this essay was published in Spain, in Politica y Sociedad, Madrid, 2001)

6. "Democratie Envers et Contre Tout:  Comportement Electoral au Nicaragua, 1990-2001," with Lawrence C. Dodd, Revue Le Banquet, (Paris), # 21 October, 2004, pp 293-323

7. "Post-socialist Democratization: A Comparative Political Economy Model of the Vote for Hungary and Nicaragua," with Michael Lewis-Beck and Mary Stegmaier, Electoral Studies, September, 2003

8. "Of Wild and Cultivated Politics: Conflict and Democracy in Argentina," International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, Fall, 2002

9. "Nicaragua Votes: The Elections of 2001," with Lawrence C. Dodd, Journal of Democracy, July, 2002.

10. "Comportamiento Electoral y Democracia en Nicaragua: 1990-2001," with Lawrence C. Dodd, America Latina Hoy, (Salamanca), April, 2002.

11. "Fascistas o Revolucionarios?  Politica Izwuierdista y Derechista de la Poblacion Pobre Rural, Politica y Sociedad, # 38, (Madrid), September-December, 2001.  (This paper was originally presented at the International Conference of Sociiology, Salamanca, Spain, September, 2001.  A shorter version of this essay was published in the United States in 2006. 

12. "Between Quiescence and Rebellion Among the Peasantry," Journal of Theoretical Politics, October, 1997

13. "Radicalism and Reformism in a Democratic Context," with Mitchell Seligson, American Journal of Political Science, November, 1994

14. "Neutrality and Bias in the 1990 Nicaraguan Pre-Electoral Polls," American Journal of Political Science, May, 1994.

15."Agrarian Politics and Revolution: Micro and State Perspectives on Structural Determinism," Journal of Theoretical Politics, October, 1993.

16. "Surprises and Secrets:  Lessons from the 1990 Nicaraguan Election," Studies in Comparative International Development, Fall, 1992

17. "Mixed Blessings: Disruption and Organization Among Costa Rican Peasant Unions," Latin American Research Review, March, 1991  published in Spanish, Revista de Historia, San Jose, Costa Rica, September, 1992

18. "Post-Materialism from a Peasant Perspective:  Political Motivation in Costa Rica and Nicaragua," Comparative Political Studies, March, 1990

19. "Alternative Action:  Peasants as Positive Participants," Journal of Latin American Studies, February, 1990

refereed book chapters and invited articles

1. "Graduate Education in a Pluralist Context: The Metaphor of a Tool Box," in Kristen Renwick Monroe, Perestroika! The Raucus Revolution in Political Science," Yale University Press, 2005

2. "Idealism, Impatience and Pessimism:  Studies of Democratization in Latin America," Latin American Research Review, 2005

3. "The Legislature as a Reflection of Democracy," Extension of Remarks, Legislative Studies Section Newsletter, American Political Science Association, July, 1995, published in Spanish, in Pais, Managua, Nicaragua, May, 1996.

4. "Public Opinion and Electoral Politics in Nicaragua," in Mitchell Seligson and John Booth, eds., Democracy and Elections in Central America, Revisited, 2nd ed, The University of North Carolina Press 1995.

5. "La Contribucion de partidos pre-democraticos a una democracia en transicion: el caso de Nicaragua," Selected Procedings of the First Central American Congress of Political Science, EDUCA, San Jose, Costa Rica, 2004

Fellowships and Grants

  1. Fulbright Fellowship, Argentina, 2008
  2. National Science Foundation Grant, 2006, awarded to Leslie Anderson and Lawrence Dodd to study the 2006 Nicaraguan election
  3. Brown University, Howard Foundation Fellowship, 1997-98
  4. National Science Foundation Grant, 1996, individual award to study 1996 Nicaragua election
  5. Fulbright Fellowship, Argentina, 1993
  6. Council of Creative Writing Research Grant, University of Colorado, for conference on   "Dimensions of Peasant Power," University of Colorado, 1992
  7. Kellogg Institute, University of Notre Dame, Faculty Fellowship, Spring, 1990
  8. Cornell University, Visiting Fellowship, Fall, 1990.
  9. Fulbright Fellowship, Costa Rica, 1985
Awards
  1. University of  Florida Research Foundation Professorship, 2006
  2. Teaching Award, Best Professor Selection, International Affairs Club, University of  Colorado, 1995
  3. Best Book Award, American Political Science Association, Transformational Politics Section, 1995
  4. Outstanding Book Award, Choice academic magazine, 1995
  5. Social Science Writing Award (awarded twice) 1991, 1992
Invited Lectures
  1. Bowdoin College, "A Tempest in a Teapot:  The 2008 Nicaraguan Municipal Elections," May, 2009
  2. University of La Matanza, Argentina, "Nicaragua's International Profile," March, 2008
  3. University of Notre Dame, Kellogg Institute, on Learning Democracy, February, 2002 
  4. University of Michigan, Department of Political Science, on Learning Democracy, February, 2002
  5. Yale University, Center for Agrarian Studies, on Learning Democracy, October, 2000
  6. University of Washington, Department of Political Science, on Learning Democracy, October, 2001
  7. University of Minnesota, on The Political Ecology of the Modern Peasant, March, 1990
  8. Cornell University, Center for International Studies, on The Political Ecology of the Modern Peasant, February, 1990
  9. Cornell University, Department of Rural Sociology, on Methods and Methodology in   Rural Fieldwork, September, 1990