Religion & Public Policy
Political Science 4931 (Section 0125)
Fall 2009


MWF, 3rd period
Dr. Wald
Anderson 134
Anderson 303
9:35-10:25
Contact: kenwald@ufl.edu or 352-273-2391

Hours: MW 2:00-4:00; T 1:30-3:30 or by appointment

All links have been moved to the Links page
Midterm Essay Grading standards are posted here.
I've linked the style guide for the paper here.

Overview: POS 4931, Religion and Public Policy, is a new course with the purpose of equipping intelligent citizens and public managers with an understanding of the role of religion in American public policy. The course is motivated by two major concerns. First, as reading a local newspaper will show you, many conflicts between religious organizations and the state could be avoided if public managers understood what the law allows and disallows regarding religion in the public square. Second, many otherwise well-informed citizens are confused or unaware about the role played by religion in American public policy. Accordingly, the course is organized to remedy these problems.

Grading: Your course grade will be based on two examinations (35% each), which will include both objective and essay questions, and a research paper (30%). The midterm examination is Friday, October 9th and the final, which is not cumulative, is scheduled on Wednesday, December 9th, at the usual class time). For students on the borderline between two grades, I reserve the right to factor in outstanding participation. The best way to achieve a high grade is to attend class regularly and keep up with the reading. There will be extra credit opportunities for (a) attending specified public lectures/events outside of class (if available) and (b) reporting broken links on the web page for the course (the first person to report a broken link by email gets an additional point on the next exam up to a maximum of five). I will be happy to make suitable accommodations for students who provide documentation of a disability from the UF Disability Resource Center.

While every semester brings its own challenges, we are told that the anticipated outbreak of H1N1 flu may wreak havoc on our plans. So, should you contract the illness, the most important thing is to avoid infecting others. To do this, don’t attend class or office hours if you have the flu (and wait 24 hours after your symptoms disappear). Unlike my normal policy, I will not require medical documentation for flu-related absences so don’t visit the Student Health Center which will simply send you home. I will adjust deadlines and arrange makeups as necessary. Anyone who infects me will be hunted down and forced to read everything I’ve ever written from kindergarten onward, a fate much worse than flu.

Readings: Class sessions will offer a mix of lecture, discussion, and videos. Reading assignments will be taken from the following paperback books:


Steven V. Monsma & J. Christopher Soper
The Challenge of Pluralism: Church & State in Five Democracies (2nd edition)
Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2009


Ronald B. Flowers
That Godless Court? Supreme Court Decisions on Church-State Relations (2nd edition)
Louisville, KY: WJKP, 2005


Paul A. Djupe & Laura R. Olson, editors
Religious Interests in Community Conflict: Beyond the Culture Wars
Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2007

 

      Bob Wineburg
      Faith-Based Inefficiency
     
Santa Barbara, CA: Garland, 2007

In addition, you will be required to read a number of online articles from academic journals and other sources.  If you're logged onto the UF network, these  articles are accessible simply by clicking on the links. But  if you're not on the UF network, you need to try one of two avenues. The easiest is to go to the UF Libraries page and sign in through the UF proxy. You will then have to go the library's home page, search for the journal, find the right issue and article, and download it. That page also provides a link to the UF VPN tunnel which is slightly more complicated to install and operate but much less restrictive than the proxy. Once you're connected via VPN, each of the links should work just as if you were directly logged into the UF network. Based on previous experience, I strongly recommend that you download all the assigned readings at once so you don't depend on uncertain web access when you need a resource.

Research Paper: Your research paper will focus on the role of religion in some public (meaning governmental) issue in the United States. You may select an issue or concern at any level of government (local, state, national or involving American foreign policy). You could pick something as broad, say, as the role of religion in debates over health care reform (see Morone in the schedule below) or note the attention given to questions about whether abortion should be covered) or as narrow as the conflict over abstinence education in a particular Florida school district. The paper should explain this issue and its religious dimension in a manner similar to the case studies in the Djupe and Olson volume. You will need to describe the actors involved in the issue or controversy, the legal and constitutional aspects of it, and the outcome or status of the issue today. In assessing papers, I also look for the way in which you have used relevant concepts discussed in the class--things like social movements or morality politics. You're encouraged to use many different kinds of sources BUT not to rely exclusively on web sources and to make sure any web sources are credible. Wikipedia is not credible so don't cite it.  In grading papers, I give principal weight to five factors: 
  1. Clear statement of problem and thesis - In the first 2 pages, you need to provide a succinct statement of the phenomena you are studying and provide a crisp statement of your central thesis/argument.  Unlike a mystery, I want to know the outcome before I read the paper.
  2. Quality of evidence and argument - Have you persuaded me of your thesis by the effective use of evidence and a strong, clear argument? If I'm not sure what you're arguing or why you've reached certain conclusions, the paper is less persuasive.
  3. Quality of research - Your goal is to find the best sources available on your subject, such quality being a function of the competence of the authors, the nature of the publication outlet, your use of proper reference styles, and the appropriate use of quotation and paraphrase. Relying too heavily on one or two sources or principally upon unreliable sources counts against you. So does improper citation. I am generally impressed by papers that draw on scholarly books and articles in academic journals, long feature articles in major newspapers (e.g., the New York Times) or serious magazines, such as Harper's or The Atlantic.
  4. Quality of writing - The best papers offer a clear authorial voice that speaks simply and clearly and is expressed in writing that follows accepted rules of grammar, syntax, and spelling. Poor writing, excessive formality, bad proofreading, and the like inhibit effective communication.
  5. Linkage to course themes - This is a biggie. If your paper reads like it was written by somebody who didn't take the class, then it misses the mark. You need to incorporate the theories, concepts, questions, and themes that are dealt with throughout the semester. How does it bear on some of what we've found already?
  6. Meeting deadlines - This is a negative criterion. You have two deadlines, submitting the paper topic & a preliminary list of references on Wednesday, October 21st and turning in the final paper in both hard copy and electronic format via Turnitin. The paper is due on Wednesday, December 2nd. For the first deadline, you will need to provide me (in writing) with a paragraph about the subject of your paper and a list of at least five potential sources that are not on the course reading list. I will review this submission and either okay your topic and sources (often with additional suggestions) or indicate that you need to meet with me in person to discuss it. While I allow for some change in focus once the proposal is accepted, a final paper that diverges massively from the proposal will be subject to special scrutiny. Late papers will be penalized at the rate of one grade per day, i.e., a B+ paper received on Friday becomes a B, a C+ the next day, and so on.
Consistent with the UF Honor Code, you need to be aware that I take a very hard line on plagiarism so you might want to look at this very useful guide. If you're intimidated by the idea of this paper, I recommend Harvey's Nuts and Bolts site. You should use the author-date style of citation sometimes known as the Chicago or Harvard style. Here is a guide.

Schedule: Because this is a new class, the schedule for lectures is more than usually tentative. I'll post changes and announce them as I make them.

Date
Topic
Readings

M

August 24

Orientation

 

W

August 26

What is Public Policy?

 

F

August 28

Why Does Religion Matter?

  

I. REGULATING RELIGION

M

August 31

 Global Patterns

Monsma & Soper, chs. 3-7 

W

Sept. 2

 Cont’d.

  

F

Sept. 4

 American Practice

Flowers, chs. 1-5

M

Sept. 6

LABOR DAY - no class 

W

Sept. 9

 Cont’d

  

F

Sept. 11

 Cont’d

  

II. KEY THEORIES & CONCEPTS

M

Sept. 14

Morality Politics         

Harrison, “Legislating Morality: The New Jersey Casino Control Act . . .,” Gaming Law Review 2 (1998), 63-69

W

Sept. 16

Social Movements

Djupe & Olsen, chs. 6, 10  

F

Sept. 18

Cont’d

  

III. ORGANIZING INTERESTS

M

Sept. 21

Advocacy Groups


W

Sept. 23

Legislative Lobbying

Micon, “Limestone Prophets: Religious Political Action Organizations . . . ,” Sociology of Religion 69 (2008), 397-413

F

Sept. 25

Cont’d

Henriques & Lehren, “Religious Groups Reap Federal Aid for Pet Projects,” New York Times, May 13, 2007  

M

Sept. 28

YOM KIPPUR – no class 

W

Sept. 30

Direct Action

Cunningham, “Sanctuary and Sovereignty . . .along the U.S.-Mexico Border,” Journal of Church & State (1998), 370-386

F

Oct. 2

Cont’d

 

M

Oct. 5

Congregational Mobilizing

Djupe & Olsen, chaps. 2, 7, 9

W

Oct. 7

Cont’d

 

F

Oct. 9

Midterm Examination 

IV. DELIVERING FAITH-BASED SERVICES

M

Oct. 12

Background

Wineburg, entire book

W

Oct. 14

Cont’d

 

F

Oct. 16

HOMECOMING - no class 

M

Oct. 19

Community Development

  

W

Oct. 21

Cont’d

  

F

Oct. 23

Charitable Choice

Kennedy & Bielefeld, “Government Shekels without Government Shackles?” Public Administration Review, 62 ( 2002), 4-11 

M

Oct. 26

Cont’d

  

W

Oct. 28

Faith-Based Initiatives

  

F

Oct. 30

Cont’d

  

 V. RELIGION & INTERNATIONAL POLICY 

M

Nov. 2

Human Rights

Hertzke, “The Shame of Darfur,” First Things, Issue 156 (Oct. 2005), 16-22 

W

Nov. 4

Cont’d


F

Nov. 6

Diasporas & For. Policy

Sheffer, “A Nation and Its Diaspora: Israeli-Jewish Diaspora Relations,” Diaspora (2002), 331-58  

M

Nov. 9

Peacemaking

& Reconciliation

Abu-Nimer, “Conflict Resolution, Culture, and Religion . . .” Journal of Peace Research (2001), 685-704

Cox and Philpott, “Faith-Based Diplomacy,” Brandywine Review of Faith and International Affairs 1 (2003), 32-40  

W

Nov. 11

VETERANS DAY - no class 

 VI. RELIGION & DOMESTIC POLICY 

F

Nov. 13

Religion in the Workplace

Brown, " . . Religious Expression in the Public Workplace," Journal of Church & State (2007), 665-682

M

Nov. 16

Cont’d

  

W

Nov. 18

Religious Land Use

Djupe & Olson, ch. 2, 8 

F

Nov. 20

Cont’d 

  

M

Nov. 23

Public Education

Flowers, chs. 6-7 

W

Nov. 25

Cont’d

Hays, “The Curious Case of School Prayer: Political Entrepreneurship and the Relative (Im)permeability of Legal Institutions”  

F

Nov. 27

THANKSGIVING BREAK – no class 

M

Nov. 30

Cont’d

  

W

Dec. 2

Public Health

Morone, “Enemies of the People: The Moral Dimension to Public Health,” Jnl of Health Politics, Policy and Law  22 (1997), 993-1020 

F

Dec. 4

Cont’d 

Djupe & Olson, ch. 5 

M

Dec. 7

Gay Rights

Djupe & Olson, chs. 3-4 

W

Dec. 9

FINAL EXAMINATION