Religion & Public Policy
Political Science 4931 (Section 1105)
Fall 2012


Tuesday, 2nd-3rd period; Thursday, 3rd period
Dr. Kenneth D. Wald
Turlington 2305
Anderson 303
Tuesday, 8:30-10:25
Contact: kenwald@ufl.edu or 352-273-2391
Thursday, 9:35-10:25
Hours:  Mondays, 12:00-3:00 or by appointment

NEWS
  • Extra Credit: You can receive a maximum of 2 points of extra credit  by attending any two of the programs on social justice at the Christian Studies Center (one point per event). For details, see here
  • The midterm study questions are posted here.
  • Study questions for the final are now posted. Enjoy!


Overview: POS 4931, Religion and Public Policy, is intended to equip intelligent citizens and future public managers with an understanding of the role of religion in American public policy. The course is motivated by two major concerns. First, many conflicts between religious organizations and the state could be avoided if public managers understood what the law allows and disallows regarding religion in the public square. Second, many otherwise well-informed citizens are confused or unaware about the role played by religion in American public policy. Accordingly, the course is organized to remedy these problems.

Grading: Your course grade will be based on two examinations (35% each), which will include both objective and essay questions, and a research paper (30%). The midterm examination is on Thursday, October 11th and the final, which is not cumulative, is scheduled on Tuesday, December 4th (at the usual class time and place). If necessary, exam scores will be scaled by adding a constant number to raise the class average. There will be extra credit opportunities for (a) attending specified public lectures/events outside of class (if available) and (b) reporting broken links on the web page for the course (the first person to report a broken link by email gets an additional point on the next exam up to a maximum of 3).For students on the borderline between two grades, I reserve the right to factor in outstanding class participation. I sometimes adjust the final grading scale but start with the following norms:

94-100
A
73-76
C
90-93
A-
70-72
C-
87-89
B+
67-69 D+
83-86
B
63-66
D
80-82
B-
60-62
D-
77-79
C+
< 60 E

Based on long experience and scientific research, the best way to achieve a high grade is to attend class regularly and keep up with the reading. If you have questions, come and see me during office hours or contact me via email or phone.
I will be happy to make suitable accommodations for students who provide documentation of a disability from the UF Disability Resource Center.

Readings: Class sessions will offer a mix of lecture, discussion, and videos. I also plan to schedule some guest speakers. Reading assignments will be taken from the following paperback books:


Steven V. Monsma & J. Christopher Soper
The Challenge of Pluralism: Church & State in Five Democracies (2nd edition)
Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2009


Ronald B. Flowers
That Godless Court? Supreme Court Decisions on Church-State Relations (2nd edition)
Louisville, KY: WJKP, 2005


Paul A. Djupe & Laura R. Olson, editors
Religious Interests in Community Conflict: Beyond the Culture Wars
Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2007


 
      Rebecca Sager
      Faith, Politics and Power: The Politics of Faith-Based Initiatives
     
New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2010

In addition, you will be required to read a number of online articles from academic journals and other sources.  If you're logged onto the UF network, these  articles are accessible simply by clicking on the links. But  if you're not on the UF network, you need to try one of two avenues. The easiest is to go to the UF Libraries page and sign in through the UF proxy. You will then have to go the library's home page, search for the journal, find the right issue and article, and download it. That page also provides a link to the UF VPN tunnel which is slightly more complicated to install and operate but much less restrictive than the proxy. (If you've never used this before, I'd recommend going to the Help Desk in the Hub 132 where they will install it for you.) Once you're connected via VPN, each of the links should work just as if you were directly logged into the UF network. Based on previous experience, I strongly recommend that you download all the assigned readings at once so you don't depend on uncertain web access when you need a resource.

The links to other course material are here.

Research Paper: Your research paper will focus on the role of religion in some public (meaning governmental) issue in the United States. You may select an issue or concern at any level of government (local, state, national or involving American foreign policy). You could pick something as broad, say, as the role of religion in debates over health care reform (see Morone in the schedule below) or note the attention given to questions about whether abortion should be covered) or as narrow as the conflict over abstinence education in a particular Florida school district. The paper should explain this issue and its religious dimension in a manner similar to the case studies in the Djupe and Olson volume. You will need to describe the actors involved in the issue or controversy, the legal and constitutional aspects of it, and the outcome or status of the issue today. In assessing papers, I also look for the way in which you have used relevant concepts discussed in the class--things like social movements or morality politics. You're encouraged to use many different kinds of sources BUT not to rely exclusively on web sources and to make sure any web sources are credible. Wikipedia is not credible so don't cite it.  In grading papers, I give principal weight to five factors: 
  1. Clear statement of problem and thesis - In the first 2 pages, you need to provide a succinct statement of the phenomena you are studying and provide a crisp statement of your central thesis/argument.  Unlike a mystery, I want to know the outcome before I read the paper.
  2. Quality of evidence and argument - Have you persuaded me of your thesis by the effective use of evidence and a strong, clear argument? If I'm not sure what you're arguing or why you've reached certain conclusions, the paper is less persuasive.
  3. Quality of research - Your goal is to find the best sources available on your subject, such quality being a function of the competence of the authors, the nature of the publication outlet, your use of proper reference styles, and the appropriate use of quotation and paraphrase. Relying too heavily on one or two sources or principally upon unreliable sources counts against you. So does improper citation. I am generally impressed by papers that draw on scholarly books and articles in academic journals, long feature articles in major newspapers (e.g., the New York Times) or serious magazines, such as Harper's or The Atlantic.
  4. Quality of writing - The best papers offer a clear authorial voice that speaks simply and clearly and is expressed in writing that follows accepted rules of grammar, syntax, and spelling. Poor writing, excessive formality, bad proofreading, and the like inhibit effective communication.
  5. Linkage to course themes - This is a biggie. If your paper reads like it was written by somebody who didn't take the class, then it misses the mark. You need to incorporate the theories, concepts, questions, and themes that are dealt with throughout the semester. How does it bear on some of what we've found already?
  6. Meeting deadlines - This is a negative criterion. You have two deadlines, submitting the paper topic & a preliminary list of references on Tuesday, October 23rd and turning in the final paper in both hard copy and electronic format via Turnitin. The paper is due on Tuesday, November 27th. For the first deadline, you will need to provide me (in writing) with a paragraph about the subject of your paper and a list of at least five potential sources that are not on the course reading list. I will review this submission and either okay your topic and sources (often with additional suggestions) or indicate that you need to meet with me in person to discuss it. While I allow for some change in focus once the proposal is accepted, a final paper that diverges massively from the proposal will be subject to special scrutiny. Late papers will be penalized at the rate of one grade per day, i.e., a B+ paper received on Friday becomes a B, a C+ the next day, and so on.
Consistent with the UF Honor Code, you need to be aware that I take a very hard line on plagiarism so you might want to look at this very useful guide. You should use the author-date style of citation sometimes known as the Chicago or Harvard style. Here is a guide with lots of examples.

Schedule: The following is my best estimate of the daily schedule. A few items, like test dates, are fixed stone but others are variable. I subscribe to the metaphor of a class as a jazz composition: "There is the basic melody that you work with. It is defined by the syllabus. But there is also a considerable measure of improvision against that disciplining background" (Source: Mark Edmundson, "The Trouble with Online Education," New York Times, 19 July 2012). I'll post changes and announce them as I make them.

Day

Date

Topic

Readings

TH

August 23

Orientation

 

TU

August 28

What is Public Policy?

Why Does Religion Matter?

 

TH

August 30

NO CLASS – APSA MEETING

I.   REGULATING RELIGION

TU

Sept. 4

Global Patterns

Monsma & Soper, chaps. 3-7

TH

Sept. 6

American Patterns

Flowers, chaps. 1-5

Cragun et al., “How Secular Humanists Subsidize Religion,” Free Inquiry (June/July 2012), 39-46

TU

Sept. 11

II.  KEY THEORIES & CONCEPTS

TH

Sept. 13

Morality Politics

Harrison, “Legislating Morality” Gaming Law Review 2 (1998), 63-69

TU

Sept. 18

Social Movements

Djupe & Olsen, chs. 6, 10  

III. ORGANIZING RELIGIOUS INTERESTS

TH

Sept. 20

Advocacy Groups

 

TU

Sept. 25

Legislative Lobbying

Micon, “Limestone Prophets” Sociology of Religion 69 (2008), 397-413

Henriques & Lehren, “Religious Groups Reap Federal Aid,” New York Times, May 13, 2007  

TH

Sept. 27

Direct Action

Cunningham, “Sanctuary and Sovereignty,” Journal of Church & State (1998), 370-386

Greenberg, “Church & Revitalization of Politics,” Political Science Quarterly 115 (2000), 377-394

TU

Oct. 2

TH

Oct. 4

Mobilizing Congregations

Djupe & Olsen, chaps. 2, 7, 9

TU

Oct. 9

Mobilizing & Review

TH

Oct. 11

MIDTERM EXAM

IV. DELIVERING FAITH-BASED SERVICES

TU

Oct. 16

Faith-Based Services

Sager, chaps. 1-2

Schneider, "Translating Religious Traditions into Service," Not by Faith Alone (2010), 165-187 RESERVE

TH

Oct. 18

Community Development

Brown, “Racial Ethnic Differences . . .” Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare 35 (2008), 95-113

TU

Oct. 23

Charitable Choice

Kennedy & Bielefeld, “Government Shekels?” Public Administration Review 62 ( 2002), 4-11

TH

Oct. 25

Faith-Based Initiative

Sager, chaps. 3-8

TU

Oct. 30

V. RELIGION & INTERNATIONAL POLICY

TH

Nov. 1

Human Rights

Hertzke, “The Shame of Darfur,” First Things, Issue 156 (Oct. 2005), 16-22 

TU

Nov. 6

Diasporas & For. Policy

Sheffer, “A Nation and Its Diaspora: Israeli-Jewish Diaspora Relations,” Diaspora (2002), 331-58 

TH

Nov. 8

Religious Peacemaking

Abu-Nimer, “Conflict Resolution, Culture, and Religion . . .” Journal of Peace Research (2001), 685-704

Cox and Philpott, “Faith-Based Diplomacy,” Brandywine Review of Faith . .  1 (2003), 32-40  

VI. RELIGION AND DOMESTIC POLICY

TU

Nov. 13

Religious Land Use

Djupe & Olson, ch. 2, 8 

TH

Nov. 15

Public Education

Flowers, chs. 6-7 

TU

Nov. 20

Religion in the Workplace

Brown, " . . Religious Expression in the Public Workplace," Journal of Church & State (2007), 665-682

TH

Nov. 22

TU

Nov. 27

Public Health

 

Morone, “Enemies of the People,” Jnl of Health Politics, Policy and Law  22 (1997), 993-1020 

Djupe & Olson, ch. 5 

TH

Nov. 29

Gay Rights

Djupe & Olson, chs. 3-4 

TU

Dec. 4

FINAL EXAM