THE H-J GUIDE TO WRITING GOOD HISTORY PAPERS
Grading criteria   **   Rules   **    Tips and checklist    **    Mechanics of quoting     
 Documentation formats
    **    What's wrong with these sentences?    **    Writing workshop guidelines


Grading criteria: argument, evidence, expression

ARGUMENT/ INTERPRETATION
Your paper needs to provide an analysis of the material.  Do not just describe events or summarize other people's ideas.  Frame your paper around a problematic (a question or issue for analysis).  Over the course of the paper, develop a logical, well-substantiated argument in response to the problem you lay out in your introduction.  Provide an interpretation that has breadth, coherence, and insight.

EVIDENCE

You should back up your argument with evidence from authoritative secondary sources and/or primary sources.  You must cite every idea you borrow from another author.  You must cite every time you quote a primary or a secondary source.  Most historians prefer footnotes (see Guide to citation formats).  You also need to include a Bibliography or Works Cited page at the end of your paper.


EXPRESSION

Writing in clear, well-organized prose is crucial to effective rhetoric (the art of making an argument).  If a reader cannot understand your meaning, then s/he will certainly not be convinced by your argument.  Think about your writing in both global (the paper as a whole and its component paragraphs) and local (the sentences and their elements) terms:

A.  OVERALL ORGANIZATION/ PARAGRAPHS

    1. THESIS STATEMENT:  you should state your argument clearly and forcefully in one or two sentences that come at the end of your introduction.

    2.  PAPER MAP: either in your thesis statement or in a subsequent sentence, you should give the reader some idea of the main sections of the paper that correspond to the main points of your argument.  

    3. TOPIC SENTENCES:  the topic sentence is the first sentence of every paragraph or, in a longer paper, every paragraph group.  They should be analytical rather than descriptive and push your argument forward in a step-by-step manner.  A reader ought to be able to read the first sentence of every paragraph and come away with an overall picture of your analysis.

    4. TRANSITIONS:  the glue that holds the paragraphs together.  You need to cue the reader (without being redundant), as you proceed from one point in your argument to the next.  Through both topic sentences and transitions, you should provide THESIS HOOKS, which connect the point you are developing to the overall argument of the paper.

B.  SENTENCES:  RULES OF CLARITY, GRAMMAR, AND PUNCTUATION.

    1. BE CONCISE.  TIGHTEN WORDY SENTENCES.  STRIVE FOR AN ECONOMY OF WORDS.

    2. WRITE IN THE ACTIVE, RATHER THAN THE PASSIVE, VOICE.
            Passive voice:  The slave was beaten by his master.
            Active voice:  The master beat the slave.

    3. BE CAREFUL AND CONSISTENT IN YOUR USE OF TENSE.
            Avoid shifts in tense.
            Stick to the past tense in writing history papers.
            Avoid the conditional tense (would, should, could). 

    4. AVOID MISPLACED PHRASES AND DANGLING MODIFIERS.
            Misplaced phrase:
                The report described the robber as a six-foot-tall man with a mustache weighing 150 pounds.
            Dangling modifier:
                Opening the window to let out a bee, the car accidentally swerved into an oncoming car.

    5. AVOID SPLIT INFINITIVES.
            The infinitive form of a verb: to avoid.  Do not separate "to" and "avoid" by other words.

    6. VARY SENTENCE OPENINGS.
   
    7
. MAKE SUBJECTS AND VERBS AGREE.

    8. MAKE PRONOUNS AND ANTECEDENTS AGREE.

    9. REPAIR SENTENCE FRAGMENTS (also called incomplete sentences).
            A sentence consists of at least one independent clause.  An independent clause has a subject and a verb (e.g. Europeans searched high and
            low for gold.).

            Fragments are:
                1) clauses that contain a subject and a verb but begin with a subordinating word (But Europeans searched high and low for gold.), or
                2) phrases that lack a subject, a verb, or both (e.g.
Here searching high and low for gold.).

    10. REPAIR RUN-ON SENTENCES (also called fused sentences).
            Run-on sentences are composed of two independent clauses that are not connected by an appropriate mark of punctuation or a coordinating conjunction.

    11. CORRECTLY INTEGRATE QUOTES.

    12. AVOID EXCESSIVE COMMA USAGE.

    13. USE SEMI-COLONS CORRECTLY.
          Only use semicolons to separate independent clauses not joined by a coordinating conjunction or between items in a series containing internal
          punctuation.
          Europeans searched high and low for gold; they found relatively little.

    14. DO NOT END SENTENCES WITH PREPOSITIONS.

    15. ELIMINATE COMMON ERRORS:
            who and whom (used for people) /that
            their (possessive adjective)/ there (adverb)
            its (possessive adjective)/it's (it is)
            affect (verb) /effect (noun; occasionally a verb, as in "to effect change")
            using contractions (e.g. "isn't") in expository writing


Writing tips and checklist


1) Does your paper have a thesis statement?
2) Do your paragraphs start with argument-driven topic sentences?
3) Do you have a title?
4) Have you numbered the pages?
5) Have you proofread your paper?


The mechanics of quoting
Documentation formats
Along with most historians, I prefer you to use the University of Chicago footnote system.  I will also accept MLA in-text citations, but you will need to be certain
your citation formats conform to the established MLA documenation system.

University of Chicago footnote format:
1) Book
1Ronald Hyam, Britain’s Imperial Century, 1818-1914: A Study of Empire and Expansion (Lanham, MD: Barnes and Noble Books, 1993), 300.

2) Chapter in book
1David Fitzpatrick, “Ireland and the Empire,” in Oxford History of the British Empire Volume 3 The Nineteenth Century, ed. Andrew Porter (Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 1999), 518.

3) Article in journal
1Simon Cordery, “Friendly Societies and the Discourse of Respectability in Britain, 1825-1875,” Journal of British Studies 34 (January 1995): 35.

4) Website
1author, title of article or site (place of publication: publisher, date, date accessed); available from [provide URL].

Bibliography format:
1) Book
Hyam, Ronald.  Britain’s Imperial Century, 1818-1914: A Study of Empire and Expansion.  Lanham, MD: Barnes and Noble Books, 1993.

2) Chapter in book
Fitzpatrick, David.  “Ireland and the Empire.”  In Oxford History of the British Empire Volume 3 The Nineteenth Century, ed. Andrew Porter, 500-520.
Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

3) Article in journal
Cordery, Simon.  “Friendly Societies and the Discourse of Respectability in Britain, 1825-1875.” Journal of British Studies 34 (January 1995): 35-58.
 
 


Writing workshop guidelines