Professor
Geoffrey J. Giles
Guidelines
for Research Papers
(including
my Pet Peeves!)
Updated:
14 February 2008
Please keep the
following
points in mind, as you complete your research papers:
-
The paper should
consist
of an introduction, in which you set out the question(s) that
you
are posing, and how you intend to answer them;
-
the main body of
the paper
in which you make your arguments and build up your thesis;
-
and a conclusion
in
which you summarize what your paper has achieved.
-
You will probably
find it
helpful to divide the paper with section headings, which will
force
you to organize your material if you should start rambling.
1) For footnotes style,
refer
to the detailed section on footnotes format in the Pocket
Guide
to Writing History by Mary Rampolla. And you must remember to give
within the footnote the page number in your source of the
quotation
that you are using.
2) The paper must
also
have a bibliography at the end, showing the books on which you
have
drawn in your paper. A specimen bibliography is given in
Rampolla.
3) Sources for your
paper:
-
PRIMARY SOURCES:
there
are so many original, translated, contemporary sources that I would
like
you to use some. These can include documents, letters,
diaries,
and so on. Interpreting original documents is what
the
historian’s craft is all about. If this is a historiographical
paper,
then the writings of the historian(s) in question themselves become the
primary sources.
-
SECONDARY SOURCES:
these are writings in which someone else has already interpreted the
raw
material. You should refer principally to scholarly
literature, and try to stick with works published in the last two
decades.
Anything older than that runs the risk of being seriously dated in ways
which may not be apparent to you, unless you have cleared the book with
me (--I am not saying that nothing decent was written before
then!
Some of my own work, for a start!). And again, that does not
apply
to a historiographical survey.
For a first-rate paper
you
will certainly wish to incorporate recent scholarly ARTICLES into your
discussion [--find them through Historical Abstracts],
because
these often give the results of the most recent research faster than
books
can be written. Many full-text articles are now available
online,
e.g. through J-STOR, but not all the crucial ones that you need will
be.
You will need to go to the University Library physically,
and pick up journals in person. I trust this will not be
seen
as a tremendous hardship! It's how real scholarship actually
works!
And please remember
that
you must footnote every sentence or passage taken directly from a
secondary
source and not expressed in your own words, or you are committing
plagiarism
[see the University's guidelines on academic dishonesty].
4) Papers sometimes
fall
apart, if one drops a big pile of them. For this reason, I
do not like plastic covers, and would prefer you to simply
staple
the pages together. In any case you must number the
pages
(—so many students ignore this simple instruction that I’m now going to
impose penalties for violations).
5) Above all, I
cannot
repeat often enough that your paper must have a THESIS, that
is,
a coherent proposition and argument about the topic you are working
with.
It is not sufficient to be merely descriptive; you must form and
express
opinions.
6) Pet
peeves!
Please pay attention to the following grammatical and stylistic points,
in order to avoid lots of red ink from me!
-
Please write in
complete
sentences! A sentence has a main verb.
Any arguments to the contrary notwithstanding. Whoops!
That last phrase did not have a verb, therefore it won’t do in a formal
essay, even though you may talk like that in informal
conversation.
Please check your essays carefully for this, or you will find my
notorious
red rubber stamp, telling you: NOT
A SENTENCE!
-
Rubber stamp #2
says: DON’T
MIX TENSES! It’s poor style to shift
indiscriminately
within the same paragraph between the past and the present
tense.
You are writing about the historical past, so unless there is some
overwhelming
reason to the contrary, you will want to use the past tense for most of
your essay when you are talking about events in the past.
That
sounds straightforward, but you may find yourself slipping into
something
like: The Prussian king then calls Bismarck, who pushes
through
the army budget over the heads of parliament. The deputies
did not like this at all. This problem can easily be
corrected
by proofreading your paper.
-
NO
APOSTROPHE! is the rubber stamp I use most of
all!
Please use care in distinguishing between singular and plural usage: The
ordinary Germans’ love of a parade was far outstripped by
Kaiser
Wilhelm’s infatuation with uniforms. In that
sentence
Germans’ is plural; if I had wanted to talk about the
ordinary German,
it would have been German’s. Here it does not
especially
matter, but consider the following: Germany and Austria entered a
defensive
alliance against Russia. Parliament’s participation in these
negotiations
was minimal. Which single parliament is meant
here?
Or does the writer mean both Germany and Austria? It is
unclear
and confusing.
-
The other big
problem is
it’s and its. With the
apostrophe
this always and only means it is, so that a teacher may
say
of a class: its major sticking point is that it’s never clear about
who the chancellor was.
-
Increasingly I find
that
few people understand the use of the hyphen. Please note the
proper
use of hyphens when using nouns as adjectives, as in the following
example:
In
twentieth-century
Britain the working class began adopting some of the middle-class
values
they had rejected in the nineteenth century.
Middle-class
is
hyphenated as an adjective, but otherwise is the middle class.
Nineteenth-century
is also the adjectival use, but there is no hyphen in the
nineteenth
century.
7)
Even worse offenses: Signs of illiteracy! There are some truly
awful,
but unfortunately very common, errors that I can only attribute to a
faulty
Florida education system. No student of history should be making
these,
-
Kings
and queens sit on a throne,
and sometimes rulers are thrown
out of office.
-
The
period that a king is on the throne is known as his reign,
whereas what you use to control a horse are the reins.
And sometimes wayward politicians are reined in.
-
If
you came with me to Stonehenge, as some students on our Cambridge
program
did, you caught sight
of a famous historical site.
-
"Motorist
on I-75 wonder about the Land Bridge Trail" -- this is an actual,
illiterate
headline in the Gainesville Sun
from February 2007! Of course it should read motorists,
because the following verb is plural. For some reason, students
too
are now frequently leaving off the final 's' in the plural of all words
ending in '-ist'. I can only conclude that this results from
sloppy
speech habits, and a tendency to mutter rather than enunciate
clearly.
It simply will not work in written English.
- There is a difference between purposely and purposefully. The latter
applies more frequently to a person who shows some determination: "She
set about writing a good essay purposefully." The former just
means that you are doing something deliberately: "He purposely left his
cell phone switched on during class in order to irritate the professor."
Please
make sure that you do not perpetrate these horrors. If I
saw
these used incorrectly in a graduate school application, I would
immediately
reject the candidate. Employers may well feel the same way.
Additional frequent and ghastly errors will be added to this page.