Population Growth in Slave Societies

Perhaps the main difference between slavery in North America and the Caribbean was that slave populations in the Caribbean rarely grew 'naturally' (as opposed to by migration).  The reason was that death rates exceeded birth rates.  But was this mainly because death rates were high or birth rates were low?  What is an appropriate point of comparison?  And what sort of evidence is available?  There exists a long scholarly debate going back to slavery times.  Its details are often technical.  The following chart gives an overview of the main factors involved.


FERTILITY

COMPONENTS

1) Child-bearing span                2) % Sterile Women                      3) Child-spacing
   

physiological.................DETERMINANTS.............................social

   

 FECUNDITY MISCARRIAGE  ABORTION  INTERCOURSE FINDING
CAUSES [onset, end, frequency
of ovulation; spermcount]


 FREQUENCY PARTNERS
mainly disease [esp. VD] disease [esp. VD]
disease disease
material  nutrition nutrition  apolitical  nutrition plantation size

 workload workload
workload population density
mainly stress
political co-resident couples population
social lactation-duration 

freedom of movement    homogeneity




lactation taboo


  


MORTALITY






'NORMAL'   INFANT SEASONING EPIDEMIC DROUGHT
adults 1-12 mths Africans 2/3 yrs

old age disease unfamiliar disease smallpox
starvation
disease  [tetanus]  malnutrition typhoid
 [nutrition- and  malnutrition   [unfamiliar diet;deprivation in transit]

  hygiene-related]  [tetany, beriberi]  stress

accidents  low birth weight


suicide infanticide
 
 
 

N.B.  Workload and nutrition interact with disease, affecting susceptibility
 to infection and recovery, and have a synergistic or multiplying effect.
Low population growth correlates with:  1. sugar cultivation  2. African slaves

                 


RETURN  to LAH 4471; to HIS 4930