Anarchy and Sovereignty
Collective Action Problems
¥ The bigger
the group, the smaller the incentive to participate
¥ Free riders
Solving Collective Action Problems
¥ Altruism (or
non-material benefits)
¥ Side
payments
¥ Exclusion
¥ Enforcement
Tragedy of the Commons
¥ Positive
utility is individual
– Negative utility is
shared
¥ Externality
without regulation
¥ The international
commons
Assumptions of the Commons
¥ No central
authority
¥ Equal access
¥ Equal
effects
¥ Imperfect
markets
How Can We Solve Commons Problems?
¥ State
control
¥ Privatization
¥ Mutual
coercion
¥ Moral
suasion, or change in values
Do IOs Matter?
¥ Should we
have them at all?
¥ Do they
accomplish what we want them to?
¥ Three
general answers:
– Liberal
– Realist
– Critical
The Liberal Answer
¥ Yes, they
matter
– And in a good way
¥ Efficiency
and common goals
¥ Functionalism
and institutionalism
The Realist Answer
¥ No, they donÕt
matter
– IR is all about states
and power
¥ IOs can be
used as a tool of state power
¥ Note the
same as saying that we shouldnÕt have them
The Critical Answer
¥ Yes, they
matter
– But in a bad way
¥ From a
number of different perspectives
– Feminist
– Marxist
– Neoconservative
How Do We Create IOs?
¥ Exclusion
from benefits
¥ Side
payments
¥ International
coercion
¥ Hegemony
¥ Moral
suasion/Ethics
International Governance, or Global
Governance?
¥ Intergovernmentalism
versus supranationalism
¥ States
versus international society
¥ Political
cooperation versus technical cooperation
¥ Example of
the European Union
IOs and Global Governance
¥ What should
the role of IOs in global governance be?
– Help states to cooperate
more effectively
– Help pave the way to
more centralized global governance
– Nothing