Anarchy and Sovereignty

 

Collective Action Problems

¥   The bigger the group, the smaller the incentive to participate

¥   Free riders

 

Solving Collective Action Problems

¥   Altruism (or non-material benefits)

¥   Side payments

¥   Exclusion

¥   Enforcement

 

Tragedy of the Commons

¥   Positive utility is individual

Negative utility is shared

¥   Externality without regulation

¥   The international commons

 

Assumptions of the Commons

¥   No central authority

¥   Equal access

¥   Equal effects

¥   Imperfect markets

 

How Can We Solve Commons Problems?

¥   State control

¥   Privatization

¥   Mutual coercion

¥   Moral suasion, or change in values

 

Do IOs Matter?

¥   Should we have them at all?

¥   Do they accomplish what we want them to?

¥   Three general answers:

Liberal

Realist

Critical

 

The Liberal Answer

¥   Yes, they matter

And in a good way

¥   Efficiency and common goals

¥   Functionalism and institutionalism

 

The Realist Answer

¥   No, they donÕt matter

IR is all about states and power

¥   IOs can be used as a tool of state power

¥   Note the same as saying that we shouldnÕt have them

 

The Critical Answer

¥   Yes, they matter

But in a bad way

¥   From a number of different perspectives

Feminist

Marxist

Neoconservative

 

How Do We Create IOs?

¥   Exclusion from benefits

¥   Side payments

¥   International coercion

¥   Hegemony

¥   Moral suasion/Ethics

 

International Governance, or Global Governance?

¥   Intergovernmentalism versus supranationalism

¥   States versus international society

¥   Political cooperation versus technical cooperation

¥   Example of the European Union

 

IOs and Global Governance

¥   What should the role of IOs in global governance be?

Help states to cooperate more effectively

Help pave the way to more centralized global governance

Nothing