Scholar Profiles
Jared Binstock
2003 - 2004 University Scholar
Mentor: Joel Demski
Warrington College of Business
"I applied to the University Scholars Program in order to learn the skills necessary to provide valuable research contributions in my field. I hope to acquire research techniques that will help me with my future plans of law school, as well as gain insight into the future of the accounting profession and its system of standards-setting."
Jared is pursuing a joint BS/MS degree in accounting and plans to graduate May 2006. His research interests include accounting, law and business. He is currently treasurer of Sigma Pi International Fraternity and has served as vice president of scholarships and awards and as professional committee chair of the Delta Sigma Pi business fraternity, and is a member of Phi Alpha Delta pre-law fraternity. In his spare time, Jared enjoys golf, running and strength training.
Research Description:
Rules Vs. Principles: The Feasibility of the Principles-Based
Approach to Accounting Standards Setting
As a University Scholar, I am researching and plan to address
the feasibility of a recently proposed plan to adopt a principles-based
approach to standard setting in Accounting. The Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) has given consideration to current debate
about the state of the financial accounting standards. Many
argue that the standards have become too detailed, complex and
rule-driven and that a principles-based (as opposed to rules-based)
approach would better promote the primary qualities of relevance
and reliability. In response to the arguments, the FASB has
proposed this principles-based approach which would not leave
room for exceptions and provide much less interpretive guidance.
Thus, the principles would rely on more professional judgment
from the accounting profession. I will provide research that
will discuss whether the principles-based approach is feasible
in relation to its alleged effect on: (1) the ability of accounting
professionals to more easily find and interpret accounting standards,
(2) the degree of implementation guidance provided with accounting
principles, (3) the degree to which aggressive and fraudulent
reporting exists among both preparers and auditors, (4) the
globalization of accounting standards setting and (5) the ability
of enforcement agencies to regulate accounting practices in
an extremely litigious environment.
Back to Profiles
Back to the Journal of Undergraduate Research

